Provisur Technologies, Inc. v. Weber, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Provisur Technologies, Inc.
Defendant: Weber, Inc., Weber Maschinenbau GmbH Breidenbach and Weber Maschinenbau GmbH Neubrandenburg
Case Number: 5:2021cv06113
Filed: September 21, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: Brian C Wimes
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER - GRANTING #5 Consent Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Plaintiff's Complaint. Defendants' Answer or response is due by December 21, 2021. Signed on 10/21/2021 by District Judge Brian C. Wimes. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached.
October 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER granting #6 motion to appear pro hac vice entered by Clerk of Court. Attorney Heather M Schneider for Provisur Technologies, Inc. allowed to appear pro hac vice. This entry will serve as authorization for the pro hac participation by the attorney. Western District of Missouri Local Rule 5.1 requires documents to be filed electronically. If pro hac vice counsel has not already done so, counsel is directed to immediately register for a WDMO e-filing account for NextGen CM/ECF. This will enable counsel to electronically file documents and receive electronic notification of filings. Register for a WDMO e-filing account at #PACER. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Warren, Melissa)
October 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Motion to allow Heather M. Schneider to appear pro hac vice (Pro Hac fee $100 receipt number AMOWDC-7610796) filed by Taylor Brooke Concannon Hausmann on behalf of Provisur Technologies, Inc.. (Attorney Taylor Brooke Concannon Hausmann added to party Provisur Technologies, Inc.(pty:pla))(Concannon Hausmann, Taylor)
September 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Consent MOTION for extension of time to file answer re #1 Complaint, filed by Jason Scott Leiker on behalf of All Defendants. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 10/14/2021 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Related document(s) #1 ) (Attorney Jason Scott Leiker added to party Weber Maschinenbau GmbH Breidenbach(pty:dft), Attorney Jason Scott Leiker added to party Weber Maschinenbau GmbH Neubrandenburg(pty:dft), Attorney Jason Scott Leiker added to party Weber, Inc.(pty:dft))(Leiker, Jason)
September 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Report on the filing of an action regarding patent number(s) 8,408,109 B2. Plaintiff(s): PROVISUR TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Lead Attorney for Plaintiff(s): Jeffrey J. Simon, Missouri Bar No. 35558 Taylor Concannon Hausmann, Missouri Bar No. 67056 HUSCH BLACKWELL LLP 4801 Main Street, Suite 1000 Kansas City, MO 64112 Defendant(s): WEBER, INC., WEBER MASCHINENBAU GMBH BREIDENBACH, and WEBER MASCHINENBAU GMBH NEUBRANDENBURG, The civil complaint is attached. (Woods, Gloria) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/21/2021: #1 Complaint) (Woods, Gloria).
September 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTICE OF INCLUSION FOR MEDIATION AND ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (MAP). REVIEW NOTICE AND MAP GENERAL ORDER CAREFULLY FOR IMPORTANT CHANGES, DEADLINES AND REQUIREMENTS.Notice of MAP assignment to an outside mediator. (Attachments: #1 MAP General Order)(Woods, Gloria)
September 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 DISCLOSURE OF CORPORATE INTERESTS filed by Jeffrey J. Simon on behalf of Plaintiff Provisur Technologies, Inc..(Simon, Jeffrey)
September 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against Weber Maschinenbau GmbH Breidenbach, Weber Maschinenbau GmbH Neubrandenburg, Weber, Inc. filed by Jeffrey J. Simon on behalf of Provisur Technologies, Inc.. Filing fee $402, receipt number AMOWDC-7593545. Service due by 12/20/2021 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Simon, Jeffrey)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Provisur Technologies, Inc. v. Weber, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Provisur Technologies, Inc.
Represented By: Jeffrey J. Simon
Represented By: Heather M Schneider
Represented By: Taylor Brooke Concannon Hausmann
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Weber, Inc.
Represented By: Jason Scott Leiker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Weber Maschinenbau GmbH Breidenbach
Represented By: Jason Scott Leiker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Weber Maschinenbau GmbH Neubrandenburg
Represented By: Jason Scott Leiker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?