Vanderpool v. Cleavenger et al
| James Dean Vanderpool |
| Victor Cleavenger and Judge Gary A Fenner |
| 5:2021cv06129 |
| October 15, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Fernando J Gaitan |
| Prisoner Pro Se |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 CLERK'S JUDGMENT: This case is dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A(b)(1), for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. (Willis, Kathy) |
Filing 9
ORDER: ORDERED that: (1) Plaintiff's request to waive the remainder of the initial partial filing fee in Doc. 8 is granted; (2) Plaintiff's request for appointment of counsel in Doc. 8 is denied; (3) the agency having custody of Plaintiff shall forward to the Clerk of the Court monthly payments of 20 percent of the preceding month's income credited to Plaintiff's account each time the amount in the account exceeds $10.00 until the remainder of the $350.00 filing fee ($339.93) is paid; and (4) this case is dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A(b)(1), for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Signed on 11/29/2021 by District Judge Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr. (Willis, Kathy)
|
| Filing 8 PLAINTIFF'S STATEMENT filed by James Dean Vanderpool.(Willis, Kathy) |
| RECEIPT number KCMO092745 in the amount of $10.07 issued to James D Vanderpool. (Woods, Gloria) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER: ORDERED that, because Plaintiff has not paid the initial partial filing fee as previously ordered, Plaintiff shall show cause, on or before November 29, 2021 as to why this case should not be dismissed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to prosecute and for failure to comply with this Court's Orders. Signed on November 15, 2021 by District Judge Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Davies, Cindy)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDERED that: (1) Plaintiff is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis; (2) Plaintiff shall pay to the clerk of the court for the Western District of Missouri, St. Joseph Division, an initial partial filing fee of $30.51; and (3) Plaintiff's failure to pay the required initial partial filing fee on or before November 9, 2021, will result in the dismissal of this case without further notice. Signed on 10/25/2021 by District Judge Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr. (Willis, Kathy)
|
| Filing 5 IFP FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT as directed by 10/18/21 order (Doc. #3 ) filed by James Dean Vanderpool. (Davies, Cindy) |
| Filing 4 INMATE ACCOUNT STATEMENT filed by James Dean Vanderpool. (Willis, Kathy) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER: ORDERED that: (1) plaintiff is granted provisional leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(a); (2) plaintiff is directed to correct the above-listed technical defects in this complaint on or before November 1, 2021; (3) the Clerk of the Court is directed to mail plaintiff a copy of this Order along with court-approved in forma pauperis forms; and(4) FAILURE OF PLAINTIFF TO COMPLY WITH THIS COURT'S ORDER WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THIS ACTION WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF. Signed on 10/18/2021 by District Judge Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr. (Willis, Kathy)
|
| Filing 2 IFP FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT filed by James Dean Vanderpool. (Willis, Kathy) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by James Dean Vanderpool. (Attachment: #1 Complaint Exhibits)(Willis, Kathy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
