Provisur Technologies v. Textor, Inc et al
Plaintiff: Provisur Technologies
Respondent: Textor, Inc., Weber, Inc., Weber Maschinenbau GMBH Breidenbach, Weber Maschinenbau GmbH Neubrandenburg and Textor Maschinenbau GmbH
3Rd Party Plaintiff: Jason Green
Case Number: 5:2021cv06170
Filed: December 20, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: Stephen R Bough
Nature of Suit: Patent
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 10, 2022 Filing 24 ELECTRONIC TRANSCRIPT of Status Conference held January 4, 2022, before Judge Stephen R. Bough. Court Reporter: Gayle Wambolt, 816-512-5641, gayle_wambolt@mow.uscourts.gov. Number of pages: 68. NOTICE RE: REDACTION OF TRANSCRIPTS: Within 7 calendar days of this filing, each party shall inform the Court, by filing a Notice of Redaction, of the parties' intent to redact personal data identifiers from the electronic transcript of the court proceeding. The policy is located on our website at www.mow.uscourts.gov. Please read this policy carefully. NOTICE: Attorneys must contact the court reporter for copies during this 90 day period. If necessary, Notice of Intent to Redact is due by 1/18/2022 unless otherwise directed by the court. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 4/11/2022. NOTICE: Attorneys must contact the court reporter for copies during this 90 day period. (Wambolt, Gayle)
January 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 23 Before the Court is Third Party Jason Green, Esq.'s Motion to Quash Defendants' Subpoena for Documents and Deposition. (Doc. #6.) On January 4, 2022, the Court presided over a hearing to resolve this motion. For the reasons stated on the record, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion to quash is GRANTED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The two subpoenas served on Jason Green are hereby quashed. Signed on 1/4/2022 by District Judge Stephen R. Bough. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Richard, Tracey)
January 4, 2022 Filing 22 Minute Entry. Proceedings held before District Judge Stephen R. Bough: STATUS CONFERENCE held on 1/4/2022. Order to be entered. Time in court: 9:00 a.m. to 10:35 a.m. To order a transcript of this hearing please contact Gayle Wambolt, 816-512-5641, gayle_wambolt@mow.uscourts.gov. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Richard, Tracey)
December 29, 2021 Filing 21 Before the Court is Jason Green's Motion for Leave to File Exhibit Under Seal and Suggestions in Support. (Doc. #19.) For good cause shown the motion is GRANTED. Signed on 12/29/2021 by District Judge Stephen R. Bough. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Richard, Tracey)
December 28, 2021 Filing 20 NOTICE of appearance by Taylor Brooke Concannon Hausmann on behalf of Jason Green (Attorney Taylor Brooke Concannon Hausmann added to party Jason Green(pty:3pd))(Concannon Hausmann, Taylor)
December 28, 2021 Filing 19 MOTION for leave to file Exhibit Under Seal and Suggestions in Support filed by Michael Babbitt on behalf of Jason Green. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 1/11/2022 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attorney Michael Babbitt added to party Jason Green(pty:3pp))(Babbitt, Michael)
December 28, 2021 Filing 18 NOTICE of filing (THIRD PARTY JASON GREEN, ESQ.S REPLY SUGGESTIONS IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO QUASH DEFENDANTS SUBPOENAS FOR DOCUMENTS AND DEPOSITION) by Jason Green re #3 Suggestions in Support of Motion, (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J)(Babbitt, Michael)
December 23, 2021 Filing 17 NOTICE OF HEARING - This is the official notice for this hearing. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. Status Conference set for 1/4/2022 at 9:00 AM in Courtroom 7B, Kansas City (SRB) before District Judge Stephen R. Bough. (Richard, Tracey)
December 21, 2021 Filing 16 NOTICE of appearance by James Albert Breckenridge on behalf of All Defendants (Breckenridge, James)
December 21, 2021 Filing 15 NOTICE of appearance by Jason Scott Leiker on behalf of All Defendants (Leiker, Jason)
December 20, 2021 Filing 14 CASE TRANSFERRED IN from District of Illinois Northern; Case Number 1:21-cv-06428.
December 20, 2021 Filing 13 TRANSFERRED to the USDC Western District of Missouri the electronic record. (exr, ) [Transferred from ilnd on 12/20/2021.]
December 17, 2021 Filing 12 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: Defendant's motion to transfer (Dckt. No. #10 ) is hereby granted. Defendants served two subpoenas seeking documents and a deposition from Jason Green, a third party, for use in two patent-infringement cases pending in the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri. Defendants served comparable subpoenas on other third parties in the Northern District of Illinois. Currently, there are similar motions to quash in four miscellaneous cases in this district, including the case at hand, all of which involve subpoenas in the same underlying litigation. See Provisur Technologies v. Weber, Inc., 21-cv-6421 (Ellis, J.); Provisur Technologies v. Weber, Inc., 21-cv-6425 (Ellis, J.); Provisur Technologies v. Weber, Inc., 21-cv-6429 (Pacold, J.). The issues in this patent case are complex, so resolving the issues would require this Court to climb a steep learning curve. On the flipside, Judge Bough has presided over the underlying litigation in the Western District of Missouri for several years, so he has a heightened familiarity with the issues at hand. Judge Bough is in the best position to render a decision on the merits. And time is of the essence, because fact discovery closes on December 22, 2021, only five days from now. Judge Bough can give a better, faster decision than this Court. According to Defendant, during a hearing on December 13, Judge Bough expressed a willingness to resolve the issues surrounding the subpoenas at hand. It makes more sense to have one judge who knows a lot about the case decide the merits of the motions, instead of three judges who know next to nothing about the case. The complexity of the case, the procedural posture, and the need for speed all weigh in favor of transfer. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(f) advisory committee's note to 2013 amendment (noting that "transfer may be warranted in order to avoid disrupting the issuing court's management of the underlying litigation, as when that court has already ruled on issues presented by the motion or the same issues are likely to arise in discovery in many districts"). Litigating this dispute in Missouri will pose no meaningful burden on Green, as illustrated by the fact that he admits his role is "managing and overseeing the underlying litigations on behalf of Provisur's owner," (Dckt. No. #6 , at 5) so he is already involved in the underlying litigation in Missouri. Id. (noting that the "prime concern should be avoiding burdens on local nonparties subject to subpoenas"). Green can present arguments against the subpoenas in the Western District of Missouri. The Court finds "exceptional circumstances" to transfer the motion to the Western District of Missouri. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(f). The Clerk is directed to transfer this action to the Western District of Missouri forthwith. The case is closed. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice. Mailed notice (jjr, ) [Transferred from ilnd on 12/20/2021.]
December 15, 2021 Filing 11 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Textor Maschinenbau GmbH, Textor, Inc, Weber Maschinenbau GMBH Breidenbach, Weber Maschinenbau GmbH Neubrandenburg, Weber, Inc. by James Lee Lovsin (Lovsin, James) [Transferred from ilnd on 12/20/2021.]
December 15, 2021 Filing 10 RESPONSE by Defendants Textor Maschinenbau GmbH, Textor, Inc, Weber Maschinenbau GMBH Breidenbach, Weber Maschinenbau GmbH Neubrandenburg, Weber, Inc. to memorandum in support of motion, #3 , miscellaneous case #6 Motion To Transfer Third Party Jason Green's Motion To Quash Or Alternatively Deny The Motion (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Corporate Disclosure Statement)(Tully, Paul) Modified on 12/17/2021 (jjr, ). [Transferred from ilnd on 12/20/2021.]
December 15, 2021 Filing 9 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Textor Maschinenbau GmbH, Textor, Inc, Weber Maschinenbau GMBH Breidenbach, Weber Maschinenbau GmbH Neubrandenburg, Weber, Inc. by Paul S. Tully (Tully, Paul) [Transferred from ilnd on 12/20/2021.]
December 2, 2021 Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: An initial status report is due by February 15, 2022. Counsel must read the Standing Order entitled "Initial Status Conferences and Joint Initial Status Reports" on the Court's website. The parties must confer as required by Rule 26(f) about the nature, scope, and duration of discovery. The parties must submit two documents to the Court. First, the parties must file the Joint Initial Status Report under Rule 26(f) on the docket. A Word version of the Joint Initial Status Report is available on the Court's website. All parties must participate in the preparation and filing of the Joint Initial Status Report. The Court requires a joint report, so a filing by one side or the other is not sufficient. Second, the parties must email a Word version of a proposed Scheduling Order under Rule 16(b) to the Court's proposed order inbox. Lead counsel for the parties must participate in filing the initial status report. Plaintiff must serve this Order on all other parties. If the defendant has not been served with process, plaintiff's counsel must contact the Courtroom Deputy at jessica_j_ramos@ilnd.uscourts.gov to reschedule the initial status report deadline. Plaintiff should not file the Joint Initial Status Report before the defendant(s) has been served with process. The parties must discuss settlement in good faith and make a serious attempt to resolve this case amicably. All counsel of record must read and comply with this Court's Standing Orders on its webpage. Please pay special attention to the Standing Orders about Depositions and Discovery. Mailed notice. (jjr, ) [Transferred from ilnd on 12/20/2021.]
December 1, 2021 ***Civil Case Terminated. (exr, ) [Transferred from ilnd on 12/20/2021.]
December 1, 2021 Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Provisur Technologies by Ren-How H. Harn (Harn, Ren-How) [Transferred from ilnd on 12/20/2021.]
December 1, 2021 Filing 6 MISCELLANEOUS CASE by Provisur Technologies THIRD PARTY JASON GREEN, ESQ.'S MOTION TO QUASH DEFENDANTS' SUBPOENA FOR DOCUMENTS AND DEPOSITION Filing fee $ 49, receipt number 0752-18924315. (Martin, Craig) [Transferred from ilnd on 12/20/2021.]
December 1, 2021 Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Provisur Technologies by Michael Glenn Babbitt (Babbitt, Michael) [Transferred from ilnd on 12/20/2021.]
December 1, 2021 Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Provisur Technologies by Sara Tonnies Horton (Horton, Sara) [Transferred from ilnd on 12/20/2021.]
December 1, 2021 Filing 3 MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO QUASH DEFENDANTS' SUBPOENAS BY THIRD PARTY JASON GREEN, ESQ. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12, #13 Exhibit 13, #14 Exhibit 14, #15 Exhibit 15, #16 Exhibit 16, #17 Exhibit 17)(Martin, Craig) [Transferred from ilnd on 12/20/2021.]
December 1, 2021 Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Provisur Technologies by Craig Christopher Martin (Martin, Craig) [Transferred from ilnd on 12/20/2021.]
December 1, 2021 Filing 1 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Martin, Craig) [Transferred from ilnd on 12/20/2021.]
December 1, 2021 CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (cxr, ) [Transferred from ilnd on 12/20/2021.]
December 1, 2021 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Steven C. Seeger. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Heather K. McShain. Case assignment: Random assignment. (cxr, ) [Transferred from ilnd on 12/20/2021.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Provisur Technologies v. Textor, Inc et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Provisur Technologies
Represented By: Craig Christopher Martin
Represented By: Michael Glenn Babbitt
Represented By: Ren-How H. Harn
Represented By: Sara Tonnies Horton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Textor, Inc.
Represented By: James Lee Lovsin
Represented By: Paul S. Tully
Represented By: James Albert Breckenridge
Represented By: Jason Scott Leiker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Weber, Inc.
Represented By: James Lee Lovsin
Represented By: Paul S. Tully
Represented By: James Albert Breckenridge
Represented By: Jason Scott Leiker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Weber Maschinenbau GMBH Breidenbach
Represented By: James Lee Lovsin
Represented By: Paul S. Tully
Represented By: James Albert Breckenridge
Represented By: Jason Scott Leiker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Weber Maschinenbau GmbH Neubrandenburg
Represented By: James Lee Lovsin
Represented By: Paul S. Tully
Represented By: James Albert Breckenridge
Represented By: Jason Scott Leiker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Textor Maschinenbau GmbH
Represented By: James Lee Lovsin
Represented By: Paul S. Tully
Represented By: James Albert Breckenridge
Represented By: Jason Scott Leiker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
3rd party plaintiff: Jason Green
Represented By: Michael Babbitt
Represented By: Taylor Brooke Concannon Hausmann
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?