Provisur Technologies v. Weber, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Provisur Technologies, Inc.
Respondent: Weber, Inc., Textor, Inc., Weber Maschinenbau GmbH Breidenbach, Weber Maschinenbau GmbH Neubrandenburg and Textor Maschinenbau GmbH
3Rd Party Plaintiff: KLINTWORTH & ROZENBLAT IP LLP
Case Number: 5:2021cv06176
Filed: December 28, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: Stephen R Bough
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 10, 2022 Filing 26 ELECTRONIC TRANSCRIPT of Status Conference held January 4, 2022, before Judge Stephen R. Bough. Court Reporter: Gayle Wambolt, 816-512-5641, gayle_wambolt@mow.uscourts.gov. Number of pages: 68. NOTICE RE: REDACTION OF TRANSCRIPTS: Within 7 calendar days of this filing, each party shall inform the Court, by filing a Notice of Redaction, of the parties' intent to redact personal data identifiers from the electronic transcript of the court proceeding. The policy is located on our website at www.mow.uscourts.gov. Please read this policy carefully. NOTICE: Attorneys must contact the court reporter for copies during this 90 day period. If necessary, Notice of Intent to Redact is due by 1/18/2022 unless otherwise directed by the court. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 4/11/2022. NOTICE: Attorneys must contact the court reporter for copies during this 90 day period. (Wambolt, Gayle)
January 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 25 Before the Court is Third Party Klintworth & Rozenblat IP, LLP's Motion to Quash Defendants' Subpoena for Documents and Deposition. (Doc. #1.) On January 4, 2022, the Court presided over a hearing to resolve this motion. For the reasons stated on the record, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion to quash is GRANTED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The subpoena served on Klintworth & Rozenblat IP, LLP is hereby quashed. Signed on 1/4/2022 by District Judge Stephen R. Bough. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Richard, Tracey)
January 4, 2022 Filing 24 Minute Entry. Proceedings held before District Judge Stephen R. Bough: STATUS CONFERENCE held on 1/4/2022. Order to be entered. Time in court: 9:00 a.m. to 10:35 a.m. To order a transcript of this hearing please contact Gayle Wambolt, 816-512-5641, gayle_wambolt@mow.uscourts.gov. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Richard, Tracey)
December 29, 2021 Filing 23 NOTICE of appearance by Jason Scott Leiker on behalf of Textor Maschinenbau GmbH, Textor, Inc., Weber Maschinenbau GmbH Breidenbach, Weber Maschinenbau GmbH Neubrandenburg, Weber, Inc. (Attorney Jason Scott Leiker added to party Textor Maschinenbau GmbH(pty:res), Attorney Jason Scott Leiker added to party Textor, Inc.(pty:res), Attorney Jason Scott Leiker added to party Weber Maschinenbau GmbH Breidenbach (pty:res), Attorney Jason Scott Leiker added to party Weber Maschinenbau GmbH Neubrandenburg(pty:res), Attorney Jason Scott Leiker added to party Weber, Inc.(pty:res))(Leiker, Jason)
December 29, 2021 Filing 22 NOTICE OF HEARING - This is the official notice for this hearing. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. Status Conference set for 1/4/2022 at 9:00 AM in Courtroom 7B, Kansas City (SRB) before District Judge Stephen R. Bough. (Richard, Tracey)
December 28, 2021 Filing 21 NOTICE of appearance by Taylor Brooke Concannon Hausmann on behalf of KLINTWORTH & ROZENBLAT IP LLP (Attorney Taylor Brooke Concannon Hausmann added to party KLINTWORTH & ROZENBLAT IP LLP(pty:3pp))(Concannon Hausmann, Taylor)
December 28, 2021 Filing 20 NOTICE of filing (THIRD PARTY KLINTWORTH & ROZENBLAT IP LLPs REPLY SUGGESTIONS IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO QUASH DEFENDANTS SUBPOENA FOR DOCUMENTS AND DEPOSITION) by KLINTWORTH & ROZENBLAT IP LLP re #4 Suggestions in Support of Motion, (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Babbitt, Michael)
December 28, 2021 Filing 19 CASE TRANSFERRED IN from District of Illinois Northern; Case Number 1:21-cv-06429.
December 28, 2021 Filing 18 TRANSFERRED to the USDC Western District of Missouri the electronic record. (exr, ) [Transferred from ilnd on 12/28/2021.]
December 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER: The Clerk is directed to transfer this action to the Western District of Missouri, forthwith. Signed by the Honorable Martha M. Pacold on 12/28/2021. Mailed notice. (exr, ) [Transferred from ilnd on 12/28/2021.]
December 21, 2021 Filing 16 MINUTE entry before the Honorable M. David Weisman: In light of the District Judge's termination of this case Dkt #15 , all matters relating to the referral of this case have been resolved. Notice of motion date of 12/27/2021 before Magistrate Judge Weisman is hereby stricken with no appearance required. Referral terminated.Mailed notice. (pk, ) [Transferred from ilnd on 12/28/2021.]
December 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER: Defendant's motion to transfer #12 is granted. Defendants served a third-party subpoena seeking documents and a deposition from Klintworth & Rozenblat, LLP, for use in two patent-infringement cases pending in the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri. Defendants served comparable subpoenas on other third parties in the Northern District of Illinois. There are or were similar motions to quash in three miscellaneous cases in this district, including this case, all of which involve subpoenas in the same underlying litigation. See Provisur Technologies v. Weber, Inc., 21-cv-6421 (Ellis, J.); Provisur Technologies v. Weber, Inc., 21-cv-6425 (Ellis, J.); Provisur Technologies v. Weber, Inc., 21-cv-6428 (Seeger, J.). As Judge Seeger recently found in 21-cv-6428, Dkt. 12: The issues in this patent case are complex. Judge Bough has presided over the underlying litigation in the Western District of Missouri for several years, so he has a heightened familiarity with the issues at hand. Judge Bough is in the best position to render a decision on the merits. Moreover, fact discovery closes on December 22, 2021, only two days from today. Judge Bough can give a better, faster decision than this Court. According to Defendant, during a hearing on December 13, Judge Bough expressed a willingness to resolve the issues surrounding the subpoenas at hand. It makes more sense to have one judge who knows a lot about the case decide the merits of the motions, instead of three judges who know next to nothing about the case. The complexity of the case, the procedural posture, and the need for speed all weigh in favor of transfer. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(f) advisory committee's note to 2013 amendment (noting that "transfer may be warranted in order to avoid disrupting the issuing court's management of the underlying litigation, as when that court has already ruled on issues presented by the motion or the same issues are likely to arise in discovery in many districts"). Judge Seeger has already transferred 21-cv-6428 to the Western District of Missouri, and this court finds it advisable to do so as well for the same reasons. The court finds "exceptional circumstances" to transfer the motion to the Western District of Missouri. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(f). The Clerk is directed to transfer this action to the Western District of Missouri. The case is closed. Signed by the Honorable Martha M. Pacold on 12/20/2021. (kl, ) [Transferred from ilnd on 12/28/2021.]
December 15, 2021 Filing 14 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Textor Maschinenbau GmbH, Textor, Inc, Weber Maschinenbau GmbH Breidenbach, Weber Maschinenbau GmbH Neubrandenburg, Weber, Inc. by James Lee Lovsin (Lovsin, James) [Transferred from ilnd on 12/28/2021.]
December 15, 2021 Filing 13 NOTICE of Motion by Paul S. Tully for presentment of motion to quash, #1 before Honorable M. David Weisman on 12/27/2021 at 10:30 AM. before Honorable M. David Weisman on 12/27/2021 at 10:00 AM. (Tully, Paul) [Transferred from ilnd on 12/28/2021.]
December 15, 2021 Filing 12 RESPONSE by Defendants Textor Maschinenbau GmbH, Textor, Inc, Weber Maschinenbau GmbH Breidenbach, Weber Maschinenbau GmbH Neubrandenburg, Weber, Inc. to memorandum in support of motion, #4 , motion to quash, #1 Motion To Transfer Third Party Klintworth & Rozenblat IP LLP's Motion To Quash Or Alternatively Deny The Motion (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Corporate Disclosure Statement)(Tully, Paul) [Transferred from ilnd on 12/28/2021.]
December 15, 2021 Filing 11 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Textor Maschinenbau GmbH, Textor, Inc, Weber Maschinenbau GmbH Breidenbach, Weber Maschinenbau GmbH Neubrandenburg, Weber, Inc. by Paul S. Tully (Tully, Paul) [Transferred from ilnd on 12/28/2021.]
December 7, 2021 Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable M. David Weisman: This case has been referred to Magistrate Judge Weisman for the purposes of holding proceedings related to Third Party Klintworth & Rozenblat IP, LLP's Motion to Quash Defendants' Subpoena for Documents and Deposition #1 . Third Party Klintworth & Rozenblat IP, LLP's Motion to Quash Defendants' Subpoena for Documents and Deposition #1 is entered and continued. Defendants response due by 12/21/2021. Third-party reply due by 01/04/2022. Ruling on motion hearing before Honorable M. David Weisman is set for 2/7/2022 at 9:15 a.m. Parties shall dial in using the Court's conference call- in number. The conference call-in number is 1-877-411-9748 and the passcode is 1814539. Mailed notice. (pk, ) [Transferred from ilnd on 12/28/2021.]
December 3, 2021 Filing 9 Pursuant to Local Rule 72.1, this case is hereby referred to the calendar of Honorable M. David Weisman for the purpose of holding proceedings related to: Third Party Klintworth & Rozenblat IP, LLP's Motion to Quash Defendants' Subpoena for Documents and Deposition #1 .(rao, ) [Transferred from ilnd on 12/28/2021.]
December 3, 2021 Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Upon review of the record, the court will refer this matter and the motion to quash the defendants' subpoena for documents and deposition #1 to Magistrate Judge Weisman. (rao, ) [Transferred from ilnd on 12/28/2021.]
December 1, 2021 Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Provisur Technologies by Ren-How H. Harn (Harn, Ren-How) [Transferred from ilnd on 12/28/2021.]
December 1, 2021 Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Provisur Technologies by Michael Glenn Babbitt (Babbitt, Michael) [Transferred from ilnd on 12/28/2021.]
December 1, 2021 Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Provisur Technologies by Sara Tonnies Horton (Horton, Sara) [Transferred from ilnd on 12/28/2021.]
December 1, 2021 Filing 4 MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO QUASH DEFENDANTS' SUBPOENA FOR DOCUMENTS AND DEPOSITION BY THIRD PARTY KLINTWORTH & ROZENBLAT IP LLP (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11)(Martin, Craig) [Transferred from ilnd on 12/28/2021.]
December 1, 2021 Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Provisur Technologies by Craig Christopher Martin (Martin, Craig) [Transferred from ilnd on 12/28/2021.]
December 1, 2021 Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Martin, Craig) [Transferred from ilnd on 12/28/2021.]
December 1, 2021 Filing 1 MISCELLANEOUS CASE by Provisur Technologies THIRD PARTY KLINTWORTH & ROZENBLAT IP, LLP'S MOTION TO QUASH DEFENDANTS' SUBPOENA FOR DOCUMENTS AND DEPOSITION Filing fee $ 49, receipt number 0752-18924499. (Martin, Craig) Modified on 12/7/2021 (pk, ). [Transferred from ilnd on 12/28/2021.]
December 1, 2021 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Martha M. Pacold. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable M. David Weisman. Case assignment: Random assignment. (cxr, ) [Transferred from ilnd on 12/28/2021.]
December 1, 2021 CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (cxr, ) [Transferred from ilnd on 12/28/2021.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Provisur Technologies v. Weber, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Provisur Technologies, Inc.
Represented By: Craig Christopher Martin
Represented By: Michael Glenn Babbitt
Represented By: Ren-How H. Harn
Represented By: Sara Tonnies Horton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
3rd party plaintiff: KLINTWORTH & ROZENBLAT IP LLP
Represented By: Taylor Brooke Concannon Hausmann
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Weber, Inc.
Represented By: Paul S. Tully
Represented By: James Lee Lovsin
Represented By: Jason Scott Leiker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Textor, Inc.
Represented By: James Lee Lovsin
Represented By: Paul S. Tully
Represented By: Jason Scott Leiker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Weber Maschinenbau GmbH Breidenbach
Represented By: James Lee Lovsin
Represented By: Paul S. Tully
Represented By: Jason Scott Leiker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Weber Maschinenbau GmbH Neubrandenburg
Represented By: James Lee Lovsin
Represented By: Paul S. Tully
Represented By: Jason Scott Leiker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Textor Maschinenbau GmbH
Represented By: James Lee Lovsin
Represented By: Paul S. Tully
Represented By: Jason Scott Leiker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?