Cadden v. Missouri Western State University et al
| Mike Cadden |
| Missouri Western State University, Rick Ebersold, Kayla Schoonover, Al Landes, Lisa Norton, Lee Tieman, Bob Wollenman, Dr. Elizabeth Kennedy, Marc Managaro, Darrell Morrison, Dr. Doug Davenport and Sarah Cravens |
| 5:2022cv06011 |
| January 19, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Gary A Fenner |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by George E. Kapke, Jr on behalf of Mike Cadden. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex 1 to Amended Complaint, #2 Exhibit Ex. 2 to Amended Complaint)(Kapke, George) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of filing Amended Complaint by Mike Cadden (Kapke, George) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF INCLUSION FOR MEDIATION AND ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (MAP). REVIEW NOTICE AND MAP GENERAL ORDER CAREFULLY FOR IMPORTANT CHANGES, DEADLINES AND REQUIREMENTS.Notice of MAP assignment to an outside mediator. (Attachments: #1 MAP General Order)(Woods, Gloria) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by George E. Kapke on behalf of All Plaintiffs. Filing fee $402, receipt number AMOWDC-7761811. Service due by 4/19/2022 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Kapke, George) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
