United States of America v. U.S. Currency
| United States of America |
| U.S. Currency |
| 5:2022cv06038 |
| March 15, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Stephen R Bough |
| Drug Related Seizure of Property |
| 21 U.S.C. ยง 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by United States of America of Plaintiff's Special Interrogatories and Request for Production to Claimant Ewing-Brown filed by Nhan D Nguyen on behalf of Plaintiff United States of America.(Nguyen, Nhan) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand on behalf of U.S. Currency.(Michaelis, Quinn) |
Filing 6
ORDER granting #5 motion to appear pro hac vice entered by Clerk of Court. Attorney Quinn A. Michaelis for U.S. Currency (Ophrastine Brown) allowed to appear pro hac vice. This entry will serve as authorization for the pro hac participation by the attorney. Western District of Missouri Local Rule 5.1 requires documents to be filed electronically. If pro hac vice counsel has not already done so, counsel is directed to immediately register for a WDMO e-filing account for NextGen CM/ECF. This will enable counsel to electronically file documents and receive electronic notification of filings. Register for a WDMO e-filing account at #PACER. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Warren, Melissa)
|
| Filing 5 Motion to allow Quinn A. Michaelis to appear pro hac vice (Pro Hac fee $100 receipt number AMOWDC-7890153) filed by Kevin P. Shepherd on behalf of U.S. Currency. (Attorney Kevin P. Shepherd added to party U.S. Currency(pty:dft))(Shepherd, Kevin) |
| Filing 4 CLAIM filed by U.S. Currency. U.S. Currency answer due 5/5/2022. on behalf of Defendant U.S. Currency. (Attorney Quinn A Michaelis added to party U.S. Currency(pty:dft))(Michaelis, Quinn) |
| Filing 3 RETURN OF SERVICE of Rule G forfeiture action executed as to U.S. Currency. U.S. Currency served on 3/18/2022. (Nguyen, Nhan) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of filing of Complaint for Forfeiture in Rem to Oprahstine Ewing-Brown by United States of America (Nguyen, Nhan) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Forfeiture In Rem against $45,812 in U.S. Currency filed by Nhan D Nguyen on behalf of United States of America. Filing fee waived. Service due by 6/13/2022 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Nguyen, Nhan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: United States of America v. U.S. Currency | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Nhan D Nguyen |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: U.S. Currency | |
| Represented By: | Kevin P. Shepherd |
| Represented By: | Quinn A Michaelis |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
