Axtell v. Stange
Plaintiff: Donald Axtell
Respondent: William (Bill) Stange
Case Number: 5:2022cv06076
Filed: June 23, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: Howard F Sachs
Referring Judge: Prisoner Pro Se
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 23, 2022 Filing 5 CASE TRANSFERRED IN from District of Missouri Eastern; Case Number 1:22-cv-00070.
June 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER..IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action shall be TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241(d). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner's motion to proceed in forma pauperis [ECF No. 2] is provisionally granted, subject to modification by the United States District Court for theWestern District of Missouri. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner's motion for appointment of counsel [ECF No. 3] is administratively termed in this District. The Western District Court of Missouri should docket the motion at transfer for review by the transferee Court.. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 6/3/22. (MRS) [Transferred from moed on 6/24/2022.]
June 3, 2022 Opinion or Order ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 4. Fri Jun 3 16:25:15 CDT 2022 (Schaefer, Michelle) [Transferred from moed on 6/24/2022.]
June 3, 2022 Opinion or Order ORDER OF TRANSFER TO OTHER DISTRICT to: Western District of Missouri Case to be transferred after 6/17/2022. (see DOC #4). Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 6/3/22. (MRS) [Transferred from moed on 6/24/2022.]
June 1, 2022 ***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Wed Jun 1 11:01:29 CDT 2022 (admin,) [Transferred from moed on 6/24/2022.]
June 1, 2022 ***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (CMH) [Transferred from moed on 6/24/2022.]
June 1, 2022 Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: U.S. District Judge John A. Ross. (CMH) [Transferred from moed on 6/24/2022.]
May 31, 2022 Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Plaintiff Donald Axtell. (CMH) [Transferred from moed on 6/24/2022.]
May 31, 2022 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Donald Axtell. (CMH) [Transferred from moed on 6/24/2022.]
May 31, 2022 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5 - Not Paid) by Plaintiff Donald Axtell. (Attachments: #1 Attachment - Theriault v. Flynn, #2 Form No. 16, #3 Original Filing Form, #4 Filing Information Sheet, #5 Envelope)(CMH). [Transferred from moed on 6/24/2022.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Axtell v. Stange
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Donald Axtell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: William (Bill) Stange
Represented By: Office of Missouri Attorney General - Habeas Division
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?