Gage et al v. Nationwide Agribusiness Insurance Company
Scott Gage, Brad Gage, Tracey Wright and Steve Gage Revocable Trust II |
Nationwide Agribusiness Insurance Company |
5:2022cv06101 |
September 9, 2022 |
US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
Greg Kays |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship) |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 Joint PROPOSED SCHEDULING ORDER by Nationwide Agribusiness Insurance Company. (Thomas, Bradley) |
Filing 12 ORDER granting #10 motion for extension of time.Suggestions in opposition/response due by 10/25/2022 unless otherwise directed by the Court. Signed on October 11, 2022 by District Judge Greg Kays. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Law Clerk). |
Filing 11 RESPONSE to motion re #6 MOTION to dismiss case Count 1 filed by Benjamin S. Creedy on behalf of Plaintiffs Brad Gage, Scott Gage, Steve Gage Revocable Trust II, Tracey Wright. Reply suggestions due by 10/21/2022 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Creedy, Benjamin) |
Filing 10 MOTION for extension of time To Respond To Defendants Partial Motion To Dismiss Count I Of Plaintiffs Petition filed by Benjamin S. Creedy on behalf of All Plaintiffs. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 10/13/2022 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Creedy, Benjamin) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of appearance by Darin J Van Thournout on behalf of Nationwide Agribusiness Insurance Company (Attorney Darin J Van Thournout added to party Nationwide Agribusiness Insurance Company(pty:dft))(Van Thournout, Darin) |
NOTICE of filing: Mediation and Assessment Program Reminder: Your Designation of Mediator is due soon (filed as an ADR event in CM/ECF). See Notice of Inclusion and MAP General Order for specifics. (ADI, MAP) |
Filing 8 RULE 16 NOTICE. Rule 26 conference due by 10/31/2022. Proposed scheduling order due by 11/14/2022. Signed on 9/27/22 by District Judge Greg Kays. (Strodtman, Tracy) |
Filing 7 SUGGESTIONS in support re #6 MOTION to dismiss case Count 1 filed by Douglas S. Beck on behalf of Defendant Nationwide Agribusiness Insurance Company. (Related document(s) #6 ) (Beck, Douglas) |
Filing 6 MOTION to dismiss case Count 1 filed by Douglas S. Beck on behalf of Nationwide Agribusiness Insurance Company. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 9/30/2022 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Beck, Douglas) |
Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand on behalf of Nationwide Agribusiness Insurance Company.(Beck, Douglas) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF INCLUSION FOR MEDIATION AND ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (MAP). REVIEW NOTICE AND MAP GENERAL ORDER CAREFULLY FOR IMPORTANT CHANGES, DEADLINES AND REQUIREMENTS.Notice of MAP assignment to an outside mediator. (Attachments: #1 MAP General Order)(Woods, Gloria) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of filing Certificate of Filing of Notice of Removal of Civil Action with the Circuit Court by Nationwide Agribusiness Insurance Company (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Beck, Douglas) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of filing Corporate Disclosure Statement by Nationwide Agribusiness Insurance Company (Beck, Douglas) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Defendant Nationwide Agribusiness Insurance Company from Circuit Court of Buchanan County, case number 22BU-CC00976, filed by Douglas S. Beck. Filing fee $402, receipt number AMOWDC-8100305. (Attachments: #1 Appendix 1, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Civil Cover Sheet)(Beck, Douglas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.