Gray v. Vandergriff
Petitioner: Corey Gray
Respondent: David Vandergriff
Case Number: 5:2022cv06140
Filed: December 21, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: Prisoner Pro Se
Referring Judge: Brian C Wimes
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 26, 2023 Filing 9 NOTICE (SEALED) by David Vandergriff re #4 Response to Order to Show Cause, Exhibit A under seal (Crane, Andrew)
January 26, 2023 Filing 8 MOTION to seal document 6 Order on Motion for Leave to File Exhibit A under seal filed by Andrew J Crane on behalf of David Vandergriff. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 2/9/2023 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Related document(s) 6 ) (Crane, Andrew) Modified on 1/26/2023 to remove attached documents at the request of the filer. Counsel will refile using correct event. (Woods, Gloria).
January 26, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER that Petitioner reply in support of his petition on or before February 27, 2023. Failure to timely reply will result in the dismissal of this case without further notice.(Related Documents #1 , #4 ) Signed on 1/26/2023 by District Judge Brian C. Wimes. (Willis, Kathy)
January 24, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER that Respondent's motion for leave (Doc. #5 ) to file Exhibit A under seal is granted.Signed on 1/24/2023 by District Judge Brian C. Wimes. (Willis, Kathy)
January 23, 2023 Filing 5 MOTION for leave to file Exhibit A under seal filed by Andrew J Crane on behalf of David Vandergriff. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 2/6/2023 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Crane, Andrew)
January 23, 2023 Filing 4 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by David Vandergriff. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit DA Appellant's Brief, #2 Exhibit DA Respondent's Brief, #3 Exhibit DA Opinion, #4 Exhibit Docket Sheet Entries, #5 Exhibit PCR Appellant's Brief, #6 Exhibit PCR Respondent's Brief, #7 Exhibit PCR Opinion, #8 Exhibit PCR Transcript, #9 Exhibit Sentence and Judgment)(Crane, Andrew)
January 6, 2023 Filing 3 NOTICE of appearance by Andrew J Crane on behalf of David Vandergriff (Attorney Andrew J Crane added to party David Vandergriff(pty:res))(Crane, Andrew)
December 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDERED that: (1) Petitioner is granted provisional leave to proceed in forma pauperis; and (2) Respondent answer Petitioner's allegations and show cause on or before JANUARY 23, 2023, why the relief Petitioner seeks should not be granted. Signed on 12/22/2022 by District Judge Brian C. Wimes. (Willis, Kathy)
December 21, 2022 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Corey Gray.(Willis, Kathy)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gray v. Vandergriff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Corey Gray
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: David Vandergriff
Represented By: Andrew J Crane
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?