Ginn v. Staffmark Investment LLC
| Kevin Ginn |
| Staffmark Investment LLC doing business as Pro Staff |
| 5:2023cv06146 |
| October 27, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Roseann Ketchmark |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Remand letter and instructions sent to Circuit Court of Buchanan County, Missouri, 411 Jules Street, Saint Joseph MO 64501. (Certified Mailing Article No. 7020 1290 0000 1306 9064) This is a text entry only - no document is attached (Houston, Kiambu) |
Filing 8
ORDER granting #7 motion to withdraw Notice of Appeal and remanding to the Circuit Court of Buchanan County, Missouri. Signed on 10/30/2023 by District Judge Roseann Ketchmark. (Brown, Jonathan)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION to withdraw document #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Charles Edwin Reis, IV on behalf of Staffmark Investment LLC. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 11/13/2023 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Related document(s) #1 ) (Reis, Charles) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF INCLUSION FOR MEDIATION AND ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (MAP). REVIEW NOTICE AND MAP GENERAL ORDER CAREFULLY FOR IMPORTANT CHANGES, DEADLINES AND REQUIREMENTS.Notice of MAP assignment to outside neutral category I. (Attachments: #1 MAP General Order)(Woods, Gloria) |
| Filing 5 DISCLOSURE OF CORPORATE INTERESTS filed by Charles Edwin Reis, IV on behalf of Defendant Staffmark Investment LLC.(Reis, Charles) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of filing Notice to Plaintiff of Removal by Staffmark Investment LLC re #1 Notice of Removal, (Reis, Charles) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of appearance by Morgan Lee Taylor on behalf of Staffmark Investment LLC (Attorney Morgan Lee Taylor added to party Staffmark Investment LLC(pty:dft))(Taylor, Morgan) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of appearance by Charles Edwin Reis, IV on behalf of Staffmark Investment LLC (Reis, Charles) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court of Buchanan County, case number 23BU-CC01626, filed by Charles Edwin Reis, IV. Filing fee $402, receipt number AMOWDC-8689239. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court File, #2 Exhibit B - Service of Process Transmittal Summary, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Reis, Charles) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ginn v. Staffmark Investment LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Kevin Ginn | |
| Represented By: | Charles Jason Brown |
| Represented By: | Jayson A. Watkins |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Staffmark Investment LLC doing business as Pro Staff | |
| Represented By: | Charles Edwin Reis, IV |
| Represented By: | Morgan Lee Taylor |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
