General Electric Company v. Boilermaker-Blacksmith National Pension Trust
Plaintiff: General Electric Company
Defendant: Boilermaker-Blacksmith National Pension Trust
Case Number: 5:2023cv06162
Filed: December 11, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: Jill A Morris
Referring Judge: Brian C Wimes
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action: 27 U.S.C. ยง 185 Enforcement of Arbitration Award
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 16, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER granting #9 motion to appear pro hac vice entered by Clerk of Court. Attorney Evan Miller for General Electric Company allowed to appear pro hac vice. This entry will serve as authorization for the pro hac participation by the attorney. Western District of Missouri Local Rule 5.1 requires documents to be filed electronically. If pro hac vice counsel has not already done so, counsel is directed to immediately register for a WDMO e-filing account for NextGen CM/ECF. This will enable counsel to electronically file documents and receive electronic notification of filings. Register for a WDMO e-filing account at #PACER. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Berner, Crystal)
January 16, 2024 Filing 10 RETURN OF WAIVER OF SERVICE filed by General Electric Company. Waiver sent to Boilermaker-Blacksmith National Pension Trust on 12/15/2023, answer due 2/13/2024. (Engle, Christina)
January 16, 2024 Filing 9 Motion to allow Evan Miller to appear pro hac vice (Pro Hac fee $100 receipt number AMOWDC-8806142) filed by Christina Pyle Engle on behalf of General Electric Company. (Engle, Christina)
December 28, 2023 Filing 8 NOTICE of appearance by Neil J Gregorio on behalf of Boilermaker-Blacksmith National Pension Trust (Attorney Neil J Gregorio added to party Boilermaker-Blacksmith National Pension Trust(pty:dft))(Gregorio, Neil)
December 27, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER granting #5 & #6 motion to appear pro hac vice entered by Clerk of Court. Attorney Jacob Roth and Tracy V. Schaffer for General Electric Company allowed to appear pro hac vice. This entry will serve as authorization for the pro hac participation by the attorney. Western District of Missouri Local Rule 5.1 requires documents to be filed electronically. If pro hac vice counsel has not already done so, counsel is directed to immediately register for a WDMO e-filing account for NextGen CM/ECF. This will enable counsel to electronically file documents and receive electronic notification of filings. Register for a WDMO e-filing account at #PACER. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Berner, Crystal)
December 27, 2023 Filing 6 Motion to allow Tracy V. Schaffer to appear pro hac vice (Pro Hac fee $100 receipt number AMOWDC-8774039) filed by Christina Pyle Engle on behalf of General Electric Company. (Engle, Christina)
December 27, 2023 Filing 5 Motion to allow Jacob Roth to appear pro hac vice (Pro Hac fee $100 receipt number AMOWDC-8774000) filed by Christina Pyle Engle on behalf of General Electric Company. (Engle, Christina)
December 13, 2023 Filing 4 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT from Magistrate Judge Jill A. Morris to District Judge Brian C. Wimes. Judge Morris no longer associated with this case. Please note the new case number: 23-6162-CV-SJ-BCW. (Melvin, Greg)
December 12, 2023 Filing 3 NOTICE OF INCLUSION FOR MEDIATION AND ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (MAP). REVIEW NOTICE AND MAP GENERAL ORDER CAREFULLY FOR IMPORTANT CHANGES, DEADLINES AND REQUIREMENTS.Notice of MAP assignment to outside neutral category I. (Attachments: #1 MAP General Order)(Woods, Gloria)
December 12, 2023 NOTICE OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE ASSIGNMENT as to Plaintiff: All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge assignment. Click # here for instructions. Form due by 1/2/2024 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Woods, Gloria)
December 12, 2023 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Boilermaker-Blacksmith National Pension Trust. (Woods, Gloria)
December 11, 2023 Filing 2 DISCLOSURE OF CORPORATE INTERESTS filed by Christina Pyle Engle on behalf of Plaintiff General Electric Company.(Engle, Christina)
December 11, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Boilermaker-Blacksmith National Pension Trust filed by Christina Pyle Engle on behalf of General Electric Company. Filing fee $405, receipt number BMOWDC-8753757. Service due by 3/11/2024 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-Signed Decision, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Engle, Christina)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: General Electric Company v. Boilermaker-Blacksmith National Pension Trust
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: General Electric Company
Represented By: Christina Pyle Engle
Represented By: Martin M. Loring
Represented By: Evan Miller
Represented By: Jacob Roth
Represented By: Tracy V Schaffer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Boilermaker-Blacksmith National Pension Trust
Represented By: Neil J Gregorio
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?