Gray v. NYK Logistics (Americas) Inc.
Plaintiff: Nathan C Gray
Defendant: NYK Logistics (Americas) Inc.
Case Number: 6:2008cv03066
Filed: February 21, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Office: Springfield Office
County: Greene
Presiding Judge: Ortrie D. Smith
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 24, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 57 ORDER and OPINION setting forth Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law in Support of Judgment for Defendant. Signed by District Judge Ortrie D. Smith on 09/24/2009. (Will-Fees, Eva)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gray v. NYK Logistics (Americas) Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nathan C Gray
Represented By: Christopher A. Hazelrigg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NYK Logistics (Americas) Inc.
Represented By: Leland H. Corley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?