Shaw v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America
Plaintiff: Tamica Shaw
Defendant: The Prudential Insurance Company of America
Case Number: 6:2010cv03355
Filed: September 2, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Office: Springfield Office
County: Greene
Presiding Judge: Greg Kays
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 1001
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 2, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 110 ORDER denying 104 Plaintiff's motion for new trial, rehearing, reconsideration or to alter or amend. Signed on 1/2/13 by District Judge Greg Kays. (Francis, Alexandra)
August 9, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 102 ORDER granting 91 Defendant's motion for summary judgment on Count II; denying 93 Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment. Signed on 8/9/12 by District Judge Greg Kays. (Francis, Alexandra)
February 9, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 89 ORDER granting 55 Defendant's motion for partial summary judgment and 57 motion to strike jury demand. Signed on 2/9/12 by District Judge Greg Kays. (Francis, Alexandra)
November 28, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 85 ORDER granting 48 Defendant's Objection to Plaintiff's Notice of Deposition; denying 51 Plaintiff's motion to strike; denying 62 Plaintiff's motion for extension of time to complete discovery; granting 70 Plaintiff's motion for extension of time to file response; denying 71 Plaintiff's motion to strike Defendant's motion for partial summary judgment; granting 72 Defendant's motion to extend deadline for filing dispositive motions. Plaintiff s hall respond to Defendant's motion for partial summary judgment on or before December 15, 2011. Both parties shall have thirty days after the Court's ruling on Defendant's partial summary judgment motion to submit any final dispositive motions. Signed on 11/28/11 by District Judge Greg Kays. (Francis, Alexandra)
March 21, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 38 ORDER - The Plaintiff's Motion to remand 10 is DENIED, and the Plaintiff's Motion to strike the Defendant's response opposing remand 22 and the Defendant's Motion to amend its Notice of Removal 29 are DENIED AS MOOT. The Pl aintiff's Motion to strike defenses 8 is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART and the Defendant's Motion to strike 15 the Plaintiff's Reply is DENIED. The Defendant may amend its answer by April 4, 2011 and the Plaintiff may reply within 14 days thereafter. Signed on 3/21/11 by District Judge Greg Kays. (Francis, Alexandra)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Shaw v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tamica Shaw
Represented By: Jerry L. Reynolds
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Prudential Insurance Company of America
Represented By: Richard J Pautler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?