Ingraham v. Dixon Ambulance District
Plaintiff: Melissa Ingraham
Defendant: Dixon Ambulance District
Case Number: 6:2010cv04160
Filed: July 23, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Office: Springfield Office
County: Pulaski
Presiding Judge: Sarah W. Hays
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 0216
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 1, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER and OPINION granting 8 motion to conditioinally certify collective action. Signed on 11/01/2010 by District Judge Ortrie D. Smith. (Will-Fees, Eva)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ingraham v. Dixon Ambulance District
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Melissa Ingraham
Represented By: Mark Alan Potashnick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dixon Ambulance District
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?