Horton v. Castillos
Petitioner: James Horton
Respondent: Juan Castillos
Case Number: 6:2011cv03212
Filed: June 15, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Office: Springfield Office
County: Greene
Presiding Judge: Richard E. Dorr
Presiding Judge: James C. England
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 22, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER denying 2 motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis; adopting 15 Report and Recommendations; petition for writ of habeas corpus dismissed without prejudice. Copy sent to petitioner via first class mail. (Schroeppel, Kerry)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Horton v. Castillos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Juan Castillos
Represented By: Earl W. Brown, III
Represented By: Cynthia J. Hyde
Represented By: Christina Leigh Wiggins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: James Horton
Represented By: Ian A. Lewis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?