Miller v. CPG Partners, L.P.
Plaintiff: Mitchell Miller
Defendant: CPG Partners, L.P.
Case Number: 6:2011cv03508
Filed: December 21, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Office: Springfield Office
County: Taney
Presiding Judge: Greg Kays
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Accomodations
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 27, 2012. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 27, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Order of Dismissal. Signed on 1/27/12 by District Judge Greg Kays. (Francis, Alexandra)
January 27, 2012 Filing 7 NOTICE of voluntary dismissal by Mitchell Miller (Keech, Jeffrey)
January 24, 2012 Filing 6 NOTICE of filing Certificate of Compliance by Mitchell Miller (Keech, Jeffrey)
January 9, 2012 Case reassigned to District Judge Greg Kays. District Judge Dean Whipple no longer assigned to the case. This is a text entry only. No document is attached. (Francis, Alexandra)
January 9, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER - Pursuant to Local Rule 83.9, and with the consent of the Honorable Gregory Kays, these cases are hereby transferred to his docket for all further proceedings. Signed on 01/09/2012 by District Judge Dean Whipple. (Willis, Kathy)
January 5, 2012 SUMMONS ISSUED as to CPG Partners, L.P.. (Howard, Linda)
December 30, 2011 Filing 4 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT from Magistrate Judge John T. Maughmer to District Judge Dean Whipple. The correct case number is 11-3508-CV-S-DW. Please change your records to reflect this assignment. (Rowland, Bonnie) (Main Document 4 replaced on 12/30/2011) (Rowland, Bonnie).
December 22, 2011 NOTICE OF DOCKET MODIFICATION. A modification has been made to the document filed on 12/21/11 as Document No. 3, Notice of EAP assignment. The document has been deleted as it was a duplicate to document #2 . This is a text entry only - no document is attached. (Howard, Linda)
December 21, 2011 Filing 3 Notice of EAP assignment to an outside mediator. (Attachments: # 1 EAP General Order)(Burch, C. Steve)
December 21, 2011 Filing 2 Notice of EAP assignment to an outside mediator. (Attachments: #1 EAP General Order)(Anderson, Christy)
December 21, 2011 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CPG Partners, L.P. filed by Jeffrey Scott Keech on behalf of Mitchell Miller. Filing fee $350, receipt number 0866-2921889. Service due by 4/23/2012. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Keech, Jeffrey)
December 21, 2011 NOTICE OF MAGISTRATE ASSIGNMENT e-mailed to pltf atty. This is a docket entry only. No document is attached. Magistrate Return due by 1/17/2012. (Anderson, Christy)
December 21, 2011 NOTICE OF MAGISTRATE ASSIGNMENT sent via electronic mail to counsel for Plaintiff. This is a docket entry only. No document is attached. Magistrate Return due by 1/17/2012.(Burch, C. Steve)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Miller v. CPG Partners, L.P.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CPG Partners, L.P.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mitchell Miller
Represented By: Jeffrey Scott Keech
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?