United States of America v. Tinney
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Kevin Tinney
Case Number: 6:2013mc03239
Filed: June 14, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Office: Springfield Office
County: Greene
Presiding Judge: David P Rush
Presiding Judge: Fernando J. Gaitan
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Enforcement of Administrative Subpoena
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 13, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER granting government's petition for summary enforcement of administrative subpoena and denying Tinney's request for a protective order. Signed on 11/13/14 by District Judge Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr. (Enss, Rhonda)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America v. Tinney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America
Represented By: Cynthia J. Hyde
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kevin Tinney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?