Mayes v. Fischer
David Lawrence Mays and David Lawrence Mayes |
Zel M Fischer |
6:2018cv03235 |
July 31, 2018 |
US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
Springfield Office |
Unknown |
Roseann Ketchmark |
Prisoner Pro Se |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 14, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 CLERK'S JUDGMENT: ORDERED that (1) Plaintiff is granted provisional leave to proceed in forma pauperis; (2) Plaintiff's motion to waive the initial partial filing fee (Doc. #4 ) is granted; (3) The agency having custody of Plaintiff forward to the Clerk of the Court monthly payments of twenty percent of the preceding month's income credited to Plaintiff's account each time the amount in the account exceeds $10 until the $350 filing fee is paid; and (4) This case is dismissed without prejudice. (Richard, Tracey) |
|
Filing 4 PLAINTIFF'S MOTION to waive partial filing fee filed by David Lawrence Mayes. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 8/17/2018. (Richard, Tracey) |
Filing 3 Inmate ACCOUNT STATEMENT filed by David Lawrence Mayes. (Richard, Tracey) |
Filing 2 IFP FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT filed by David Lawrence Mayes. (Richard, Tracey) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Zel M Fischer filed by David Lawrence Mayes. (Richard, Tracey) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.