Yelton v. Pash
Petitioner: Brett Yelton
Respondent: Ronda Pash
Case Number: 6:2018cv03346
Filed: October 18, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: Prisoner Pro Se
Referring Judge: Brian C Wimes
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 12, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 12, 2018 Filing 9 CLERK'S JUDGMENT: ORDERED that this case is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for Petitioner's failure to comply with the Court's order. Petitioner is advised that any motion to reopen this case will be denied unless it is filed in a timely manner and accompanied by a reply to the State's response. Petitioner also is advised that, although dismissal is without prejudice, his claims are subject to the period of limitation contained in 28 U.S.C. 2244. (Richard, Tracey)
December 12, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER: ORDERED that this case is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for Petitioner's failure to comply with the Court's order. Petitioner is advised that any motion to reopen this case will be denied unless it is filed in a timely manner and accompanied by a reply to the State's response. Petitioner also is advised that, although dismissal is without prejudice, his claims are subject to the period of limitation contained in 28 U.S.C. 2244. Signed on December 12, 2018 by District Judge Brian C. Wimes. (Richard, Tracey)
November 2, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER that Petitioner file a reply to the State's response (Doc. 6) by December 3, 2018. Signed on November 2, 2018, by District Judge Brian C. Wimes. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (McCoy, Mike)
November 1, 2018 Filing 6 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Ronda Pash. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J)(Myers, Olivea)
October 25, 2018 Filing 5 NOTICE of appearance by Olivea Alannah Myers on behalf of Ronda Pash (Attorney Olivea Alannah Myers added to party Ronda Pash(pty:res))(Myers, Olivea)
October 18, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER: ORDERED that: (1) Petitioner is granted provisional leave to proceed in forma pauperis; and (2) Respondent answer Petitioner's allegations and show cause on or before November 17, 2018, why the relief Petitioner seeks should not be granted. Signed on October 18, 2018 by District Judge Brian C. Wimes. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Davies, Cindy)
October 18, 2018 Filing 2 IFP FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT filed by Brett Yelton. (Davies, Cindy)
October 18, 2018 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Brett Yelton.(Davies, Cindy)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Yelton v. Pash
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Brett Yelton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Ronda Pash
Represented By: Olivea Alannah Myers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?