Yelton v. Pash
Brett Yelton |
Ronda Pash |
6:2018cv03346 |
October 18, 2018 |
US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
Prisoner Pro Se |
Brian C Wimes |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 12, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 CLERK'S JUDGMENT: ORDERED that this case is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for Petitioner's failure to comply with the Court's order. Petitioner is advised that any motion to reopen this case will be denied unless it is filed in a timely manner and accompanied by a reply to the State's response. Petitioner also is advised that, although dismissal is without prejudice, his claims are subject to the period of limitation contained in 28 U.S.C. 2244. (Richard, Tracey) |
Filing 8 ORDER: ORDERED that this case is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for Petitioner's failure to comply with the Court's order. Petitioner is advised that any motion to reopen this case will be denied unless it is filed in a timely manner and accompanied by a reply to the State's response. Petitioner also is advised that, although dismissal is without prejudice, his claims are subject to the period of limitation contained in 28 U.S.C. 2244. Signed on December 12, 2018 by District Judge Brian C. Wimes. (Richard, Tracey) |
Filing 7 ORDER that Petitioner file a reply to the State's response (Doc. 6) by December 3, 2018. Signed on November 2, 2018, by District Judge Brian C. Wimes. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (McCoy, Mike) |
Filing 6 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Ronda Pash. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J)(Myers, Olivea) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of appearance by Olivea Alannah Myers on behalf of Ronda Pash (Attorney Olivea Alannah Myers added to party Ronda Pash(pty:res))(Myers, Olivea) |
Filing 4 ORDER: ORDERED that: (1) Petitioner is granted provisional leave to proceed in forma pauperis; and (2) Respondent answer Petitioner's allegations and show cause on or before November 17, 2018, why the relief Petitioner seeks should not be granted. Signed on October 18, 2018 by District Judge Brian C. Wimes. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Davies, Cindy) |
Filing 2 IFP FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT filed by Brett Yelton. (Davies, Cindy) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Brett Yelton.(Davies, Cindy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Yelton v. Pash | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Brett Yelton | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Ronda Pash | |
Represented By: | Olivea Alannah Myers |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.