Dowty v. Smith et al
Petitioner: Earl D Dowty
Respondent: Douglas Weber and Michael D. Smith
Case Number: 6:2018cv03404
Filed: December 6, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: Beth Phillips
Referring Judge: Prisoner Pro Se
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 17, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 17, 2018 Filing 10 PETITIONER'S MEMORANDUM filed by Earl D Dowty.(Davies, Cindy)
December 13, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER that Petitioner's motion for leave to file an amended petition (Doc. #8 ) is denied as futile. This case was dismissed without prejudice on December 10, 2018 (Doc. #6 ), and Petitioner's proposed amended motion would be subject to dismissal without prejudice for the same reasons set forth in this Court's dismissal Order. Signed on 12/13/2018 by District Judge Beth Phillips. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Doty, Greg)
December 13, 2018 Filing 8 PETITONER'S MOTION for leave to file amended complaint filed by Earl D Dowty. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 12/27/2018. (Attachment: #1 Exhibit) (Richard, Tracey)
December 10, 2018 Filing 7 CLERK'S JUDGMENT: ORDERED that (1) Petitioner is granted provisional leave to proceed in forma pauperis; and (2) this case is summarily dismissed without prejudice, subject to Petitioner seeking 2254 relief in the appropriate court, after seeking and obtaining permission from the Eighth Circuit to file a successive 2254 petition. (Richard, Tracey)
December 10, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: ORDERED that (1) Petitioner is granted provisional leave to proceed in forma pauperis; and (2) this case is summarily dismissed without prejudice, subject to Petitioner seeking 2254 relief in the appropriate court, after seeking and obtaining permission from the Eighth Circuit to file a successive 2254 petition. Signed on December 10, 2018 by District Judge Beth Phillips. (Richard, Tracey)
December 6, 2018 Filing 4 Inmate ACCOUNT STATEMENT filed by Earl D Dowty. (Davies, Cindy)
December 6, 2018 Filing 3 IFP FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT filed by Earl D Dowty. (Davies, Cindy)
December 6, 2018 Filing 2 PETITIONER'S MEMORANDUM in support of habeas corpus petition (Doc. #1 ) filed by Earl D Dowty. (Attachment: #1 Exhibit)(Davies, Cindy)
December 6, 2018 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Earl D Dowty. (Attachment: #1 Exhibits)(Davies, Cindy)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dowty v. Smith et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Douglas Weber
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Michael D. Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Earl D Dowty
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?