Brooks-Keller v. Walmart #46
| Barbara Brooks-Keller |
| Walmart #46 |
| 6:2019cv03015 |
| January 11, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Beth Phillips |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| NOTICE of filing: Mediation and Assessment Program Reminder: Your post-mediation status report is due within 10 calendar days after the mediation. See MAP FAQs on Court's website for specifics and submit report(s) to: map@mow.uscourts.gov. (ADI, MAP) |
Filing 9
SCHEDULING ORDER: Discovery due by 8/30/2019. Dispositive Motions due by 9/30/2019. Teleconference set for 1/30/2020 10:00 AM. Pretrial Conference set for 2/13/2020 10:00 AM via teleconference. Jury Trial set for 2/24/2020 08:30 AM in Courtroom 2, Springfield (VJC) before Chief District Judge Beth Phillips. Signed on 3/4/19 by Chief District Judge Beth Phillips. (Cordell, Annette)
|
| Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Walmart #46 filed by James R. Jarrow on behalf of Defendant Walmart #46.(Jarrow, James) |
| Filing 7 DESIGNATION OF MEDIATOR naming Jim Newberry(Jarrow, James) |
| Filing 6 Joint PROPOSED SCHEDULING ORDER by Barbara Brooks-Keller. (Morlan, Tad) |
| Filing 5 DISCLOSURE OF CORPORATE INTERESTS filed by James R. Jarrow on behalf of Defendant Walmart #46.(Jarrow, James) |
| NOTICE of filing: Mediation and Assessment Program Reminder: Your Designation of Mediator is due soon (filed as an ADR event in CM/ECF). See Notice of Inclusion and MAP General Order for specifics. (ADI, MAP) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER. RULE 16 NOTICE. Proposed scheduling order due by 2/28/2019. Rule 26 conference due by 2/14/2019. Signed on 1/14/19 by Chief District Judge Beth Phillips. (Cordell, Annette)
|
| Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand on behalf of Walmart #46.(Jarrow, James) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF INCLUSION FOR MEDIATION AND ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (MAP). REVIEW NOTICE AND MAP GENERAL ORDER CAREFULLY FOR IMPORTANT CHANGES, DEADLINES AND REQUIREMENTS.Notice of MAP assignment to an outside mediator. (Attachments: #1 MAP General Order)(Keller, Jeanne) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from In the Circuit Court of Polk County, Missouri County, case number 18PO-CC00068, Walmart #46. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number AMOWDC-6120696. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Jarrow, James) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/11/2019: #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Woods, Gloria). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Brooks-Keller v. Walmart #46 | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Barbara Brooks-Keller | |
| Represented By: | Tad K. Morlan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Walmart #46 | |
| Represented By: | James R. Jarrow |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
