Hoot et al v. AT&T Pension Benefit Plan
| Kelly Lynn Hoot and Ronald Edward Hoot |
| AT&T Pension Benefit Plan |
| 6:2019cv03068 |
| February 14, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| John T Maughmer |
| Beth Phillips |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1001 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by AT&T Pension Benefit Plan. (Boatright, Daniel) |
Filing 15
ORDER granting #14 Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to Respond (Doc. 14) is GRANTED. Any response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss shall be filed within fourteen (14) days after the Court issues an order on Mr. Hoot's Motion to Remand and/or issues an order on its Order to Show Cause regarding jurisdiction, whichever is later. No other deadlines are affected by this Order. Signed on 3/28/19 by Chief District Judge Beth Phillips. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Cordell, Annette)
|
| Filing 14 MOTION for extension of time to file response/reply as to #11 Suggestions in Support of Motion, #10 MOTION to dismiss case filed by Raymond Lampert on behalf of Ronald Edward Hoot. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 4/10/2019 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Related document(s) #11 , #10 ) (Lampert, Raymond) |
|
Filing 13
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. It is ORDERED that within ten (10) days from the date of this Order, Defendant shall show cause why this case should not be remanded for lack of federal question jurisdiction. Plaintiffs may also file a brief on this issue within ten (10) days after Defendant files its response to this show cause order. Signed on 3/25/19 by Chief District Judge Beth Phillips. (Cordell, Annette)
|
| Filing 12 SUGGESTIONS in opposition re #8 MOTION to remand case to State of Missouri filed by Daniel B. Boatright on behalf of Third Party Defendant AT&T Pension Benefit Plan. Reply suggestions due by 4/3/2019 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A- Siegel Declaration)(Related document(s) #8 ) (Boatright, Daniel) |
| Filing 11 SUGGESTIONS in support re #10 MOTION to dismiss case filed by Daniel B. Boatright on behalf of Third Party Defendant AT&T Pension Benefit Plan. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D)(Related document(s) #10 ) (Boatright, Daniel) |
| Filing 10 MOTION to dismiss case filed by Daniel B. Boatright on behalf of AT&T Pension Benefit Plan. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 3/28/2019 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Boatright, Daniel) |
| Filing 9 SUGGESTIONS in support re #8 MOTION to remand case to State of Missouri filed by Raymond Lampert on behalf of Third Party Plaintiff Ronald Edward Hoot. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Summons for AT&T)(Related document(s) #8 ) (Lampert, Raymond) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to remand case to State of Missouri filed by Raymond Lampert on behalf of Ronald Edward Hoot. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 3/20/2019 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Lampert, Raymond) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of appearance by Raymond Lampert on behalf of Ronald Edward Hoot (Attorney Raymond Lampert added to party Ronald Edward Hoot(pty:3pp))(Lampert, Raymond) |
| NOTICE of filing: Mediation and Assessment Program Reminder: Your Designation of Mediator is due soon (filed as an ADR event in CM/ECF). See Notice of Inclusion and MAP General Order for specifics. (ADI, MAP) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER. RULE 16 NOTICE. Proposed scheduling order due by 4/11/2019. Rule 26 conference due by 3/28/2019. Signed on 2/26/19 by Chief District Judge Beth Phillips. (Cordell, Annette)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #3 : Third-Party Defendant AT&T Pension Benefit Plan's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Responsive Pleading (Doc. 3) is GRANTED. The new deadline to file an answer or other responsive pleading is March 14, 2019. Signed on 2/26/19 by Chief District Judge Beth Phillips. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Cordell, Annette)
|
| Filing 4 ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER TRANSFERRING/REASSIGNING CASE. Due to a conflict of interest by the Honorable Magistrate Judge John T. Maughmer, this case was randomly reassigned to the Honorable Chief District Judge Beth Phillips for all further proceedings. Please note the new case number: 19-3068-CV-S-BP. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Siegert, Karen) |
| Filing 3 Consent MOTION for extension of time to file answer or file responsive pleading filed by Daniel B. Boatright on behalf of AT&T Pension Benefit Plan. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 3/7/2019 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Boatright, Daniel) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF INCLUSION FOR MEDIATION AND ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (MAP). REVIEW NOTICE AND MAP GENERAL ORDER CAREFULLY FOR IMPORTANT CHANGES, DEADLINES AND REQUIREMENTS.Notice of MAP assignment to an outside mediator. (Attachments: #1 MAP General Order)(Keller, Jeanne) |
| NOTICE OF MAGISTRATE ASSIGNMENT emailed to all counsel. This is a docket entry only. No document is attached. Magistrate Return due by 3/8/2019 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Keller, Jeanne) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court of Christian County Missouri County, case number 38V010100575-01, AT&T Pension Benefit Plan. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number AMOWDC-6176683. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-State Court Record, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Boatright, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
