Schweitzer v. Preferred Family Healthcare, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Shelbie Dawn Schweitzer
Defendant: Preferred Family Healthcare, Inc. and Springfield Partners LLC
Case Number: 6:2019cv03240
Filed: July 5, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: M Douglas Harpool
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 14, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 14 DISCLOSURE OF CORPORATE INTERESTS of Separate Defendant Springfield Partners, LLC filed by Daniel K. Wooten on behalf of Defendant Springfield Partners LLC.(Wooten, Daniel)
August 14, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 13 DISCLOSURE OF CORPORATE INTERESTS of Separate Defendant Preferred Family Healthcare, Inc. filed by Daniel K. Wooten on behalf of Defendant Preferred Family Healthcare, Inc..(Wooten, Daniel)
August 14, 2019 Opinion or Order NOTICE of filing: Mediation and Assessment Program Reminder: Your Designation of Mediator is due soon (filed as an ADR event in CM/ECF). See Notice of Inclusion and MAP General Order for specifics. (ADI, MAP)
August 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 12 RULE 16 NOTICE. Proposed scheduling order due by 9/26/2019. Rule 26 conference due by 9/11/2019. Signed on 8/12/19 by District Judge M. Douglas Harpool. (View, Pat)
August 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand on behalf of Preferred Family Healthcare, Inc..(Wooten, Daniel)
August 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand on behalf of Springfield Partners LLC.(Wooten, Daniel)
July 30, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER granting #8 consent motion for extension of time to file response to complaint. Defendant Springfield Partners, LLC has up to and including August 9, 2019 to file a response. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Roubal, Kristen)
July 30, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Consent MOTION for extension of time to File Response to Complaint filed by Daniel K. Wooten on behalf of Springfield Partners LLC. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 8/13/2019 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attorney Daniel K. Wooten added to party Springfield Partners LLC(pty:dft))(Wooten, Daniel)
July 29, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 RETURN OF SERVICE of complaint executed by Shelbie Dawn Schweitzer. Preferred Family Healthcare, Inc. served on 7/10/2019, answer due 7/31/2019. (Privette, Bailey)
July 29, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER granting #5 consent motion for extension of time to file response to Complaint. Defendant Preferred Family Healthcare, Inc. has up to and including August 9, 2019 to file a response. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Roubal, Kristen)
July 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Consent MOTION for extension of time to file response/reply to Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Daniel K. Wooten on behalf of Preferred Family Healthcare, Inc.. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 8/9/2019 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Wooten, Daniel)
July 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE of appearance by Daniel K. Wooten on behalf of Preferred Family Healthcare, Inc. (Attorney Daniel K. Wooten added to party Preferred Family Healthcare, Inc.(pty:dft))(Wooten, Daniel)
July 16, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 RETURN OF SERVICE of complaint executed by Shelbie Dawn Schweitzer. Springfield Partners LLC served on 7/9/2019, answer due 7/30/2019. (Murphy, Kyle)
July 5, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 NOTICE OF INCLUSION FOR MEDIATION AND ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (MAP). REVIEW NOTICE AND MAP GENERAL ORDER CAREFULLY FOR IMPORTANT CHANGES, DEADLINES AND REQUIREMENTS.Notice of MAP assignment to an outside mediator. (Attachments: #1 MAP General Order)(Burch, Steve)
July 5, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Preferred Family Healthcare, Inc., Springfield Partners LLC filed by Kyle Edward Murphy on behalf of Shelbie Dawn Schweitzer. Filing fee $400, receipt number AMOWDC-6387418. Service due by 10/3/2019 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Murphy, Kyle)
July 5, 2019 Opinion or Order SUMMONSES ISSUED as to Preferred Family Healthcare, Inc. and Springfield Partners LLC. Summonses returned via electronic mail to counsel for Plaintiff for service. (Burch, Steve)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Schweitzer v. Preferred Family Healthcare, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Preferred Family Healthcare, Inc.
Represented By: Daniel K. Wooten
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Springfield Partners LLC
Represented By: Daniel K. Wooten
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shelbie Dawn Schweitzer
Represented By: Brandon D. Burkhart
Represented By: Kyle Edward Murphy
Represented By: Bailey Privette
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?