The Gathering Tree d/b/a Eden Village v. City of Springfield, MO
| The Gathering Tree d/b/a Eden Village |
| City of Springfield, MO |
| 6:2019cv03261 |
| July 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| M Douglas Harpool |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 PRAECIPE [referencing ECF 14]. (Carter, Douglas) |
| Filing 15 SUGGESTIONS in opposition re #3 MOTION for preliminary injunction filed by Douglas L. Carter on behalf of Defendant City of Springfield, MO. Reply suggestions due by 9/25/2019 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Related document(s) #3 ) (Carter, Douglas) |
| Filing 14 SUGGESTIONS in support re #13 MOTION for summary judgment and in opposition to motion for preliminary injunction filed by Douglas L. Carter on behalf of Defendant City of Springfield, MO. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F)(Related document(s) #13 ) (Carter, Douglas) |
| Filing 13 MOTION for summary judgment filed by Douglas L. Carter on behalf of City of Springfield, MO. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 10/2/2019 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Carter, Douglas) |
| Filing 12 MOTION for leave to file excess pages filed by Douglas L. Carter on behalf of City of Springfield, MO. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 9/25/2019 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Carter, Douglas) |
| NOTICE of filing: Mediation and Assessment Program Reminder: Your Designation of Mediator is due soon (filed as an ADR event in CM/ECF). See Notice of Inclusion and MAP General Order for specifics. (ADI, MAP) |
Filing 11
RULE 16 NOTICE. Proposed scheduling order due by 10/25/2019. Rule 26 conference due by 10/10/2019. Signed on 9/10/19 by District Judge M. Douglas Harpool. (View, Pat)
|
| Filing 10 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand on behalf of City of Springfield, MO. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Carter, Douglas) |
| Filing 9 RETURN OF SERVICE of complaint executed by The Gathering Tree d/b/a Eden Village. City of Springfield, MO served on 8/7/2019, answer due 8/28/2019. (Stringer, Benjamin) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #7 motion for extension of time. Defendant shall respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction by 9/11/2019. Signed on 8/14/2019 by District Judge M. Douglas Harpool. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Levin, Benjamin)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for extension of time to Respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction filed by Douglas L Carter on behalf of City of Springfield, MO. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 8/27/2019 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Carter, Douglas) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of appearance by Paul A. Campo on behalf of City of Springfield, MO (Attorney Paul A. Campo added to party City of Springfield, MO(pty:dft))(Campo, Paul) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of appearance by Douglas L Carter on behalf of City of Springfield, MO (Attorney Douglas L Carter added to party City of Springfield, MO(pty:dft))(Carter, Douglas) |
| Filing 4 SUGGESTIONS in support re #3 MOTION for preliminary injunction filed by Benjamin A. Stringer on behalf of Plaintiff The Gathering Tree d/b/a Eden Village. (Related document(s) #3 ) (Stringer, Benjamin) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for preliminary injunction filed by Benjamin A. Stringer on behalf of The Gathering Tree d/b/a Eden Village. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 8/14/2019 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Stringer, Benjamin) |
| SUMMONS ISSUED as to City of Springfield, MO. (Siegert, Karen) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF INCLUSION FOR MEDIATION AND ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (MAP). REVIEW NOTICE AND MAP GENERAL ORDER CAREFULLY FOR IMPORTANT CHANGES, DEADLINES AND REQUIREMENTS.Notice of MAP assignment to an outside mediator. (Attachments: #1 MAP General Order)(Keller, Jeanne) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against City of Springfield, MO filed by Benjamin A. Stringer on behalf of The Gathering Tree d/b/a Eden Village. Filing fee $400, receipt number AMOWDC-6408344. Service due by 10/17/2019 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D)(Stringer, Benjamin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: The Gathering Tree d/b/a Eden Village v. City of Springfield, MO | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: City of Springfield, MO | |
| Represented By: | Paul A. Campo |
| Represented By: | Douglas L. Carter |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: The Gathering Tree d/b/a Eden Village | |
| Represented By: | Benjamin A. Stringer |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
