USA v. Swalley
| USA |
| Paul Swalley |
| 6:2019cv03303 |
| August 23, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| M Douglas Harpool |
| David P Rush |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 4246 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 17, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER granting #7 Sealed Motion. Signed on 10/15/2019 by Magistrate Judge David P. Rush. (DO) Modified on 10/18/2019 copy mailed to dft Swalley (Siegert, Karen).
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE (SEALED) by Paul Swalley (Mercer, David) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Order (SEALED) filed by David R. Mercer on behalf of Paul Swalley. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 10/29/2019 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Mercer, David) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time. Defendant's motion for an additional mental examination is due by 10/15/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge David P. Rush on 10/2/2019. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (DO)
|
| NOTICE OF HEARING CANCELLATION - The evidentiary hearing scheduled for 10/8/2019 at 9:00 AM has been cancelled. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (DO) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Order (SEALED) filed by David R. Mercer on behalf of Paul Swalley. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 10/15/2019 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Mercer, David) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF HEARING - This is the official notice for this hearing. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. Evidentiary Hearing set for 10/8/2019 at 9:00 AM in USMCFP - Springfield before Magistrate Judge David P. Rush. (DO) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER (SEALED)- Any motion for an additional psychological examination must be filed on or before 9/30/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge David P. Rush on 8/29/2019. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (DO)
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge David P. Rush, and appointing the Federal Public Defender to represent the Defendant. Signed on 8/29/2019 by District Judge M. Douglas Harpool. (Keller, Jeanne)
|
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR MENTAL STATUS (SEALED) Petition to Determine Present Mental Condition of an Imprisoned Person filed by Christina L. Scofield on behalf of USA. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. A-order, #2 Exhibit Ex. B-report, #3 Exhibit Ex. C-certificate)(Scofield, Christina) (Main Document 1 replaced to correct service date, on 8/29/2019) NEF regenerated. (Keller, Jeanne). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: USA v. Swalley | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Paul Swalley | |
| Represented By: | David R. Mercer |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: USA | |
| Represented By: | Shane Patrick McCullough |
| Represented By: | Cynthia J. Hyde |
| Represented By: | Christina L. Scofield |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
