Putman v. Cohn et al
| Tony Lamar Putman |
| Wendt and Brandon Cohn |
| 6:2019cv03374 |
| October 15, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Roseann Ketchmark |
| Prisoner Pro Se |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER that Plaintiff's motion for an extension of time, up to and including December 26, 2019, in which to pay the initial partial filing fee (Doc. #9 ) is granted. Insofar as Plaintiff claims that he has already paid the initial partial filing fee, as of the date of this Order, the Court has no record of receiving any payment from Plaintiff related to this case. Plaintiff has now received two extensions of the deadline to pay the initial partial filing fee, in addition to the period of time in which he was asked to show cause for his failure to pay (See Docs. 7 , 8 ). No further extensions of time will be granted. If Plaintiff has not paid the initial partial filing fee by December 26, 2019, this case will be dismissed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to prosecute and for failure to comply with this Court's Orders. Signed on December 9, 2019 by District Judge Roseann Ketchmark. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Davies, Cindy)
|
| Filing 9 PLAINTIFF'S MOTION for extension of time to comply filed by Tony Lamar Putman. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 12/23/2019. (Davies, Cindy) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER: ORDERED that, because Plaintiff has not paid the initial partial filing fee as previously ordered, Plaintiff shall show cause, on or before December 4, 2019 as to why this case should not be dismissed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to prosecute and for failure to comply with this Court's Orders. Signed on November 20, 2019 by District Judge Roseann Ketchmark. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Davies, Cindy)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER that, in light of Plaintiff's statement regarding the initial partial filing fee (Doc. #6 ), on the Court's own motion, Plaintiff is granted an extension of time, up to and including November 19, 2019, in which to pay the initial partial filing fee. No further extensions of time will be granted absent a clear demonstration of extraordinary circumstances. Signed on November 12, 2019 by District Judge Roseann Ketchmark. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Davies, Cindy)
|
| Filing 6 PLAINTIFF'S STATEMENT regarding initial partial filing fee filed by Tony Lamar Putman.(Davies, Cindy) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER: ORDERED that: (1) Plaintiff is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis; (2) Plaintiff shall pay to the clerk of the court for the Western District of Missouri, Western Division, an initial partial filing fee of $12.66; and (3) Plaintiff's failure to pay the required initial partial filing fee on or before November 7, 2019, will result in the dismissal of this case without further notice. Signed on October 24, 2019 by District Judge Roseann Ketchmark. (Davies, Cindy)
|
| Filing 3 Inmate ACCOUNT STATEMENT filed by Tony Lamar Putman. (Davies, Cindy) |
| Filing 2 IFP FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT filed by Tony Lamar Putman. (Davies, Cindy) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Tony Lamar Putman. (Attachment: #1 Exhibit)(Davies, Cindy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
