Bradford v. Moose et al
| Kennon Bradford |
| Thomas Corsolini, Austin Childers, Dr. Moose and Michael D. Smith |
| 6:2019cv03395 |
| November 1, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Beth Phillips |
| Prisoner Pro Se |
| Mandamus & Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1346 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 30, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 RETURN OF SERVICE of complaint executed. United States Attorney for the Western District of Missouri served on 12/30/2019. (Davies, Cindy) |
| SUMMONS ISSUED as to Austin Childers, Nurse; Dr. Thomas Corsolini; Dr. Moose; Warden Michael D. Smith; Attorney General of the United States; and, United States Attorney for the Western District of Missouri. Copy of USM 285 Summons, Complaint, and Order of 12/18/2019 sent to US Marshals Service for service. (Willis, Kathy) |
Filing 7
ORDER: ORDERED that: (1) the agency having custody of Plaintiff forward to the Clerk of the Court monthly payments of twenty percent of the preceding month's income credited to Plaintiff's account each time the amount in the account exceeds $10 until the $350 filing fee is paid; (2) the Clerk of the Court shall issue appropriate summons as authorized by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4 and shall deliver the summons, the complaint, and a copy of this Order to the United States Marshals Service for service of process on Defendants Dr. Moose, Warden Michael D. Smith, Dr. Thomas Corsolini, and Nurse Austin Childers; (3) pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(i)(1)(A) and (B), the United States Marshals Service shall serve a copy of the summons, the complaint, and this Order on the Attorney General of the United States at Washington, District of Columbia, and the United States Attorney for the Western District of Missouri (Attention: Civil Process Clerk); and (4) pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(3), Defendants shall answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint within 60 days from the date of service upon the United States Attorney for the Western District of Missouri. Signed on 12/18/2019 by Chief District Judge Beth Phillips. (Willis, Kathy)
|
| RECEIPT number KCMO081291 in the amount of $43.00 issued to FBO: Kennon Bradford. (Kern, Kendra) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER: ORDERED that, because Plaintiff has not paid the initial partial filing fee as previously ordered, Plaintiff shall show cause, on or before December 6, 2019 as to why this case should not be dismissed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to prosecute and for failure to comply with this Court's Orders. Signed on November 22, 2019 by Chief District Judge Beth Phillips. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Davies, Cindy)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER: ORDERED that: (1) Plaintiff is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis; (2) Plaintiff shall pay to the clerk of the court for the Western District of Missouri, Western Division, an initial partial filing fee of $43.00; and (3) Plaintiff's failure to pay the required initial partial filing fee on or before November 20, 2019, will result in the dismissal of this case without further notice. Signed on November 6, 2019 by Chief District Judge Beth Phillips. (Davies, Cindy)
|
| Filing 3 INMATE ACCOUNT STATEMENT filed by Kennon Bradford. (Davies, Cindy) |
| Filing 2 IFP FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT filed by Kennon Bradford. (Davies, Cindy) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Kennon Bradford. (Attachment: #1 Exhibits)(Davies, Cindy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
