General Casualty Company of Wisconsin v. Ash et al
| General Casualty Company of Wisconsin |
| Annette Ash, Andrew Ash, Lucas Ash and Thomas Ash |
| 6:2019cv03442 |
| December 31, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| M Douglas Harpool |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER granting #10 Plaintiff's motion for extension of time to file response in opposition to Defendants' motion to dismiss. Plaintiff has up to and including March 9, 2020 to file its response. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Roubal, Kristen)
|
| Filing 10 MOTION for extension of time to file response/reply as to #8 MOTION to dismiss case filed by Elaine Marie Moss on behalf of General Casualty Company of Wisconsin. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 3/6/2020 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Related document(s) #8 ) (Moss, Elaine) |
| NOTICE of filing: Mediation and Assessment Program Reminder: Your Designation of Mediator is due soon (filed as an ADR event in CM/ECF). See Notice of Inclusion and MAP General Order for specifics. (ADI, MAP) |
|
Filing 9
RULE 16 NOTICE. Proposed scheduling order due by 3/26/2020. Rule 26 conference due by 3/11/2020. Signed on 2/10/20 by District Judge M. Douglas Harpool. (View, Pat)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION to dismiss case filed by Andrew Jay Gelbach on behalf of All Defendants. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 2/24/2020 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Attorney Andrew Jay Gelbach added to party Andrew Ash(pty:dft), Attorney Andrew Jay Gelbach added to party Annette Ash(pty:dft), Attorney Andrew Jay Gelbach added to party Lucas Ash(pty:dft), Attorney Andrew Jay Gelbach added to party Thomas Ash(pty:dft))(Gelbach, Andrew) |
| Filing 7 RETURN OF SERVICE of complaint executed by General Casualty Company of Wisconsin. Andrew Ash served on 1/20/2020, answer due 2/10/2020. (Moss, Elaine) |
| Filing 6 RETURN OF SERVICE of complaint executed by General Casualty Company of Wisconsin. Lucas Ash served on 1/20/2020, answer due 2/10/2020. (Moss, Elaine) |
| Filing 5 RETURN OF SERVICE of complaint executed by General Casualty Company of Wisconsin. Annette Ash served on 1/20/2020, answer due 2/10/2020. (Moss, Elaine) |
| Filing 4 RETURN OF SERVICE of complaint executed by General Casualty Company of Wisconsin. Thomas Ash served on 1/20/2020, answer due 2/10/2020. (Moss, Elaine) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF INCLUSION FOR MEDIATION AND ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (MAP). REVIEW NOTICE AND MAP GENERAL ORDER CAREFULLY FOR IMPORTANT CHANGES, DEADLINES AND REQUIREMENTS.Notice of MAP assignment to an outside mediator. (Attachments: #1 MAP General Order)(Keller, Jeanne) |
| SUMMONS ISSUED electronically and delivered by email to plaintiff as to Andrew Ash, Annette Ash, Lucas Ash, Thomas Ash. (James, Carrie) |
| Filing 2 DISCLOSURE OF CORPORATE INTERESTS filed by Elaine Marie Moss on behalf of Plaintiff General Casualty Company of Wisconsin.(Moss, Elaine) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against General Casualty Company of Wisconsin General Casualty Company of Wisconsin. Filing fee $400, receipt number AMOWDC-6648205. Service due by 3/30/2020 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Civil Cover Sheet)(Moss, Elaine) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
