USA v. Gray
USA |
Dewayne Grat and Dewayne Gray |
6:2020cv03120 |
April 22, 2020 |
US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
M Douglas Harpool |
David P Rush |
Other Statutory Actions |
18 U.S.C. ยง 4245 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDER (SEALED) - Because the Bureau of Prisons has currently suspended legal visits, the deadline to file any motion for an additional psychiatric or psychological examination is extended to 7/31/2020. Signed on 6/1/2020 by Magistrate Judge David P. Rush. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (DO) Modified on 6/2/2020 copy of NEF mailed to dft Gray (Siegert, Karen). |
Filing 3 ORDER (SEALED) - Motion for additional mental examination, if any, due by 6/5/2020. Signed on 5/6/2020 by Magistrate Judge David P. Rush. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (DO) |
Filing 2 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge David P. Rush and appointing Federal Public Defender's Office to represent the defendant. Signed on 4/30/20 by District Judge M. Douglas Harpool. (Siegert, Karen) Modified on 4/30/2020 copy of order mailed to dft Dewayne Gray (Siegert, Karen). |
Filing 1 PETITION FOR MENTAL STATUS (SEALED) Petition To Determine Present Mental Condition of an Imprisoned Person filed by Shane Patrick McCullough on behalf of USA. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(McCullough, Shane) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.