Smart v. Kell et al
Plaintiff: Andrew M Smart
Defendant: Kenneth Kell and Polk County Jail
Case Number: 6:2020cv03170
Filed: June 3, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: Beth Phillips
Referring Judge: Prisoner Pro Se
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition)
Cause of Action: 42:1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 6, 2020 Filing 6 CLERK'S JUDGMENT: ORDERED that: (1) Plaintiff is granted provisional leave to proceed as a pauper, (2) this case is dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A(b)(1) for Plaintiff's failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, (3) the agency having custody of Plaintiff forward to the Clerk of the Court monthly payments of 20% of the preceding month's income credited to Plaintiff's account each time the amount in the account exceeds $10.00 until the $350.00 filing fee is paid, and (4) Plaintiff is cautioned that federal law "makes prisoners responsible for [appellate filing fees of $505.00 (in addition to the $350.00 filing fee already owed for this case)] the moment the prisoner... files an appeal." Henderson v. Norris, 129 F.3d 481, 483 (8th Cir. 1997) (citation and quotation marks omitted). (Davies, Cindy)
July 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: ORDERED that: (1) Plaintiff is granted provisional leave to proceed as a pauper, (2) this case is dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A(b)(1) for Plaintiff's failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, (3) the agency having custody of Plaintiff forward to the Clerk of the Court monthly payments of 20% of the preceding month's income credited to Plaintiff's account each time the amount in the account exceeds $10.00 until the $350.00 filing fee is paid, and (4) Plaintiff is cautioned that federal law "makes prisoners responsible for [appellate filing fees of $505.00 (in addition to the $350.00 filing fee already owed for this case)] the moment the prisoner... files an appeal." Henderson v. Norris, 129 F.3d 481, 483 (8th Cir. 1997) (citation and quotation marks omitted). Signed on July 6, 2020 by Chief District Judge Beth Phillips. (Davies, Cindy)
June 3, 2020 Filing 3 Inmate ACCOUNT STATEMENT filed by Andrew M Smart. (Davies, Cindy)
June 3, 2020 Filing 2 IFP FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT filed by Andrew M Smart. (Davies, Cindy)
June 3, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Andrew M Smart. (Davies, Cindy)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smart v. Kell et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kenneth Kell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Polk County Jail
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Andrew M Smart
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?