Smart v. Morrison et al
| Andrew M Smart |
| Ken Minica, Danny Morrison and Kenneth Ray Ashlock |
| 6:2020cv03172 |
| June 5, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Beth Phillips |
| Prisoner Pro Se |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 CLERK'S JUDGMENT: Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A(b)(1), this case is dismissed as legally frivolous and for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. (Willis, Kathy) |
Filing 5
ORDER: ORDERED that: (1) Plaintiff is granted provisional leave to proceed in forma pauperis; (2) the agency having custody of the Plaintiff forward to the Clerk of the Court monthly payments of 20 percent of the preceding months income credited to Plaintiffs account each time the amount in the account exceeds $10.00 until the $350.00 filing fee is paid; and (3) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A(b)(1), this case is dismissed as legally frivolous and for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Signed on 06/15/2020 by Chief District Judge Beth Phillips. (Willis, Kathy)
|
| Filing 3 Inmate ACCOUNT STATEMENT filed by Andrew M Smart. (Davies, Cindy) |
| Filing 2 IFP FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT filed by Andrew M Smart. (Davies, Cindy) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Andrew M Smart. (Davies, Cindy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
