Blue Thunder v. Smith
| James David Blue Thunder |
| Michael Smith |
| 6:2020cv03274 |
| August 31, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Stephen R Bough |
| Prisoner Pro Se |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER that Petitioner shall file a reply, on or before October 26, 2020, to Respondent's response (Doc. #9 ), or this case may be dismissed without further notice. Signed on October 1, 2020 by District Judge Stephen R. Bough. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Davies, Cindy)
|
| Filing 9 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Michael Smith. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F)(Moss, Christa) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of appearance by Christa Barber Moss on behalf of Michael Smith (Attorney Christa Barber Moss added to party Michael Smith(pty:res))(Moss, Christa) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER that Petitioner's motion for reconsideration of this Court's Order denying Petitioner's request for release on personal recognizance bond (Doc. #6 ) is denied because Petitioner fails to set forth any appropriate reason for this Court to reconsider that Order. Signed on 9/21/2020 by District Judge Stephen R. Bough. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Willis, Kathy)
|
| Filing 6 PETITIONER'S MOTION for reconsideration filed by James David Blue Thunder. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 10/5/2020. (Attachment: #1 Exhibit) (Willis, Kathy) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER that (1) Petitioner's motion for appointment of counsel (Doc. #2 ) is denied without prejudice, as it does not appear at this time that an evidentiary hearing will be required in this matter or that appointment of counsel is required for the fair presentation of Petitioner's claims; (2) Petitioner's motion for release on personal recognizance bond (Doc. #3 ) is denied as without merit; and (3) Respondent shall respond to Petitioner's petition on or before October 1, 2020, and show cause why the relief Petitioner seeks should not be granted. Signed on 9/1/2020 by District Judge Stephen R. Bough. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Willis, Kathy)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Blue Thunder v. Smith | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Michael Smith | |
| Represented By: | Christa Barber Moss |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: James David Blue Thunder | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
