Woods v. Fulghum et al
| Darrell Woods |
| Caroline Jenkins, Katherine Barton and Fulghum |
| 6:2020cv03391 |
| December 7, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Beth Phillips |
| Prisoner Pro Se |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 11, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 CLERK'S JUDGMENT: ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and this case is dismissed, without prejudice, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). If Plaintiff wishes to reassert his claims, he first must pay the filing and administrative fees totaling $400. (Davies, Cindy) |
Filing 5
ORDER: ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and this case is dismissed, without prejudice, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). If Plaintiff wishes to reassert his claims, he first must pay the filing and administrative fees totaling $400. Signed on December 11, 2020 by Chief District Judge Beth Phillips. (Davies, Cindy)
|
| Filing 3 Inmate ACCOUNT STATEMENT filed by Darrell Woods. (Davies, Cindy) |
| Filing 2 IFP FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT filed by Darrell Woods. (Davies, Cindy) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Darrell Woods. (Davies, Cindy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
