Garrett v. 25th Circuit Court of Missouri et al
| Mason Garrett |
| 25th Circuit Court of Missouri and Pulaski County Sheriff's Office |
| 6:2021cv03173 |
| July 7, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Jill A Morris |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 PRO SE MOTION for summary judgment filed by Mason Garrett. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 9/10/2021 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(Melvin, Greg) |
| Filing 2 FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT by Mason Garrett. (Woods, Gloria) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Mason Garrett. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 7/22/2021 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Questions, #4 Notes, #5 Envelope)(Woods, Gloria) |
| NOTICE OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE ASSIGNMENT as to Plaintiff: All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge assignment. Paper copy of Magistrate Assignment form mailed to Pro Se Plaintiff with instructions to complete and return by due date. Form due by 7/29/2021 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Woods, Gloria) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
