Miller v. Saul
Plaintiff: William Frederick Miller
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Case Number: 6:2021cv03218
Filed: August 18, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: W Brian Gaddy
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 416
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 1, 2021 Opinion or Order THIRD NOTICE OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE ASSIGNMENT as to plaintiff: All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge assignment. Click # here for instructions. Form due by 10/12/2021 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Melvin, Greg)
September 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 RETURN OF SERVICE of Social Security complaint. United States Attorney General served on 9/8/2021. (Vasquez, Rick)
September 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 RETURN OF SERVICE of Social Security complaint. Commissioner of Social Security, Office of the Regional Counsel served on 9/2/2021. (Vasquez, Rick)
September 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 RETURN OF SERVICE of Social Security complaint on United States Attorney. Summons served on 9/2/2021 Social security answer due by 11/1/2021 unless otherwise directed by the court. Record of Submission due by 12/1/2021 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Vasquez, Rick)
September 9, 2021 Opinion or Order SECOND NOTICE OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE ASSIGNMENT as to all parties: All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge assignment. Click # here for instructions. Form due by 9/30/2021 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Melvin, Greg)
August 30, 2021 Opinion or Order SUMMONSES ISSUED as to Andrew M. Saul, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Siegert, Karen)
August 18, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT filed by Rick S. Vasquez on behalf of William Frederick Miller. (Filing fee $402 receipt number AMOWDC-7540927) filed byRick S. Vasquez on behalf of William Frederick Miller. Service due by 11/16/2021 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Attorney Rick S. Vasquez added to party William Frederick Miller(pty:pla))(Vasquez, Rick)
August 18, 2021 Opinion or Order NOTICE OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE ASSIGNMENT as to all parties: All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge assignment. Click # here for instructions. Form due by 9/8/2021 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Siegert, Karen)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Miller v. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: William Frederick Miller
Represented By: Rick S. Vasquez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Represented By: OGCSSAR7
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?