Compton v. Taney County Sheriff's Department
| Daniel Compton |
| Taney County Sheriff's Department |
| 6:2021cv03252 |
| September 27, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Prisoner Pro Se |
| Brian C Wimes |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 CLERK'S JUDGMENT: This case is dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A(b)(1) for Plaintiffs failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. (Willis, Kathy) |
Filing 7
ORDER: This case is dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A(b)(1) for Plaintiff's failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Plaintiff is cautioned that, if he files an appeal, he will be obligated to pay appellate filing fees of $505.00 (fees that are in addition to the $350.00 he already owes for having filed this case). See Henderson v. Norris, 129 F.3d 481, 483 (8th Cir. 1997) (citation and quotation marks omitted). The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed on 10/29/2021 by District Judge Brian C. Wimes. (Willis, Kathy)
|
| Filing 6 PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE to Doc. #5 filed by Daniel Compton.(Davies, Cindy) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER: ORDERED that: (1) the agency having custody of Plaintiff forward to the Clerk of the Court monthly payments of 20 percent of the preceding month's income credited to plaintiff's account each time the amount in the account exceeds $10.00 until the $350.00 filing fee is paid; and (2) Plaintiff provide the Court with the information file described above by November 12, 2021; otherwise, this case will be dismissed. Signed on October 20, 2021 by District Judge Brian C. Wimes. (Davies, Cindy)
|
| RECEIPT number KCMO092169 in the amount of $45.57 issued to Daniel Compton. (Ellis, Lindsey) |
|
Filing 4
ORDERED that: (1) Plaintiff is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis; (2) Plaintiff shall pay to the clerk of the court for the Western District of Missouri, Southern Division, an initial partial filing fee of $45.57; and (3) Plaintiff's failure to pay the required initial partial filing fee on or before October 13, 2021, will result in the dismissal of this case without further notice. Signed on 9/29/2021 by District Judge Brian C. Wimes. (Willis, Kathy)
|
| Filing 3 INMATE ACCOUNT STATEMENT filed by Daniel Compton. (Willis, Kathy) |
| Filing 2 IFP FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT filed by Daniel Compton. (Willis, Kathy) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Daniel Compton. (Willis, Kathy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Compton v. Taney County Sheriff's Department | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Daniel Compton | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Taney County Sheriff's Department | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
