Danner v. Doe 1 et al
| Nathan Wayne Danner |
| John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and John Doe 3 |
| 6:2022cv03023 |
| January 26, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Prisoner Pro Se |
| Brian C Wimes |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Case electronically transferred to the Eastern District of Missouri. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Davies, Cindy) |
Filing 5
ORDER: ORDERED that Plaintiff is granted provisional leave to proceed in forma pauperis, Plaintiff's motion for appointed counsel (Doc. #4 ) is denied without prejudice, and this case is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri for all further proceedings. Signed on February 1, 2022 by District Judge Brian C. Wimes. (Davies, Cindy)
|
| Filing 4 PLAINTIFF'S MOTION for appointment of counsel filed by Nathan Wayne Danner. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 2/15/2022. (Davies, Cindy) |
| Filing 3 Inmate ACCOUNT STATEMENT filed by Nathan Wayne Danner. (Davies, Cindy) |
| Filing 2 IFP FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT filed by Nathan Wayne Danner. (Davies, Cindy) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Nathan Wayne Danner. (Attachment: #1 Exhibits)(Davies, Cindy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
