Ramsey v. Krueger et al
| Federico Ramsey |
| J.E. Krueger and US Medical Center Staff |
| 6:2022cv03036 |
| February 22, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Stephen R Bough |
| Prisoner Pro Se |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER that: (1) the agency having custody of Plaintiff forward to the Clerk of the Court monthly payments of 20 percent of the preceding month's income credited to Plaintiff's account each time the amount in the account exceeds $10.00 until the remainder of filing fee ($283.69) is paid; (2) the Clerk of the Court shall mail Plaintiff additional civil rights forms for his use in submitting an amended complaint; and (3) Plaintiff is granted leave, up to and including May 2, 2022, in which to amend his complaint as directed. Signed on 4/12/2022 by District Judge Stephen R. Bough. (CLERK'S NOTE: Collect filing fee letter mailed to United States Medical Center for Federal Prisoners Finance Office with copy of 4/12/2022 Order and additional civil rights forms mailed to Plaintiff with a copy of this Order as directed. (Willis, Kathy)
|
| RECEIPT number KCMO094788 in the amount of $66.31 issued to BOP for Federico Ramsey. (Melvin, Greg) |
| Filing 7 PLAINTIFF'S STATEMENT regarding initial partial filing fee filed by Federico Ramsey.(Davies, Cindy) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER: ORDERED that, because Plaintiff has not paid the initial partial filing fee as previously ordered, Plaintiff shall show cause, on or before April 8, 2022 as to why this case should not be dismissed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to prosecute and for failure to comply with this Court's Orders. Signed on March 25, 2022 by District Judge Stephen R. Bough. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Davies, Cindy)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER: ORDERED that: (1) Plaintiff is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis; (2) Plaintiff shall pay to the clerk of the court for the Western District of Missouri, Western Division, an initial partial filing fee of $66.31; and (3) Plaintiff's failure to pay the required initial partial filing fee on or before March 23, 2022, will result in the dismissal of this case without further notice. Signed on March 9, 2022 by District Judge Stephen R. Bough. (Davies, Cindy)
|
| Filing 4 Inmate ACCOUNT STATEMENT filed by Federico Ramsey. (Davies, Cindy) |
| Filing 3 IFP FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT as directed by 2/23/2022 (Doc. #2 ) filed by Federico Ramsey. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Davies, Cindy) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER that: (1) plaintiff is granted provisional leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(a); (2) plaintiff is directed to correct the listed technical defects on or before March 9, 2022; (3) the Clerk of the Court is directed to mail plaintiff a copy of this Order along with court-approved in forma pauperis forms; and (4) FAILURE OF PLAINTIFF TO COMPLY WITH THIS COURT'S ORDER WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THIS ACTION WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF. Signed on 2/23/2022 by District Judge Stephen R. Bough. (CLERK'S NOTE: A copy of this Order and court-approved in forma pauperis forms mailed to Plaintiff as directed.) (Willis, Kathy)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Federico Ramsey. (Willis, Kathy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
