Crown Equipment Corporation v. Plude
| Crown Equipment Corporation doing business as Crown Lift Trucks |
| Christopher Plude |
| 6:2022cv03051 |
| March 4, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Stephen R Bough |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 25
The parties have informed the Court that they agree to extend the effective date of the Court's TRO Order through May 16, 2022. For good cause stated, the request is GRANTED. The Court's March 28, 2022, TRO Order (Doc. #19) shall remain in effect up to and including May 16, 2022. Signed on 4/27/2022 by District Judge Stephen R. Bough. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Richard, Tracey)
|
| Filing 24 AMENDED NOTICE OF HEARING - This is the official notice for this hearing. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. Oral Argument on preliminary injunction is RESET for 5/16/2022 at 2:30 PM in Courtroom 7B, Kansas City (SRB) before District Judge Stephen R. Bough. (Richard, Tracey) |
| NOTICE of filing: Mediation and Assessment Program Reminder: Your Designation of Mediator is due soon (filed as an ADR event in CM/ECF). See Notice of Inclusion and MAP General Order for specifics. (ADI, MAP) |
| Filing 23 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Crown Equipment Corporation of Plaintiff's Amended Notice of Video-Taped Deposition filed by Bryce Langford on behalf of Plaintiff Crown Equipment Corporation.(Langford, Bryce) |
|
Filing 22
RULE 16 NOTICE. Proposed scheduling order due by 5/20/2022. Telephonic Scheduling Conference set for 6/2/2022 at 1:30 PM before District Judge Stephen R. Bough. Conference call-in numbers will be provided to counsel via email the week prior to the scheduling conference. Signed on 4/19/2022 by District Judge Stephen R. Bough. (Richard, Tracey)
|
| Filing 21 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, and Affirmative Defenses on behalf of Christopher Plude.(Whittingham, Larissa) |
| Filing 20 On April 4, 2022, the parties informed the Court that they wish to continue the April 5, 2022, preliminary injunction oral argument hearing and extend the effective date of the Court's TRO Order through May 4, 2022. For good cause stated, the request is GRANTED. The Court's March 28, 2022, TRO Order (Doc. #19) shall remain in effect up to and including May 4, 2022. The oral argument for preliminary injunction is RESET for May 4, 2022, at 1:30 PM in Courtroom 7B, Kansas City (SRB) before District Judge Stephen R. Bough.(Richard, Tracey) |
|
Filing 19
ORDER granting #6 motion for TRO. Signed on 3/28/2022 by District Judge Stephen R. Bough. (Richard, Tracey)
|
| Filing 18 Before this Court is Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond to Complaint (Doc. #17). For good cause, shown the Motion is granted and Defendant may answer or respond by April 4, 2022. Signed on 3/28/2022 by District Judge Stephen R. Bough. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Richard, Tracey) |
| Filing 17 MOTION for extension of time to file answer or otherwise respond to complaint filed by Larissa M Whittingham on behalf of Christopher Plude. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 4/11/2022 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Whittingham, Larissa) |
| Filing 16 AMENDED NOTICE OF HEARING - This is the official notice for this hearing. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. Oral Argument on preliminary injunction is RESET for 4/5/2022 at 1:30 PM in Courtroom 7B, Kansas City (SRB) before District Judge Stephen R. Bough. (Richard, Tracey) AMENDED AS TO TIME ONNLY |
| Filing 15 Minute Entry. Proceedings held before District Judge Stephen R. Bough: ORAL ARGUMENT on the pending Motion for TRO held on 3/24/2022. Order to be entered. Oral Argument on a preliminary injunction set for 4/5/2022 at 9:00 AM in Courtroom 7B, Kansas City (SRB) before District Judge Stephen R. Bough. Counsel appearing for Plaintiff(s): Bradley Yeretsky and Bryce Langford. Counsel appearing for Defendant(s): Bryan Wade and Larissa Whittingham. Time in court: 1:34 p.m. to 2:06 p.m. To order a transcript of this hearing please contact Gayle Wambolt, 816-512-5641, gayle_wambolt@mow.uscourts.gov. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Richard, Tracey) |
| Filing 14 AMENDED NOTICE OF HEARING - This is the official notice for this hearing. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. Oral Argument on the pending Motion for TRO (Doc. #6) is set for 3/24/2022 at 1:30 PM in Courtroom 7D, Kansas City (BCW) before District Judge Stephen R. Bough. (Richard, Tracey) AMENDED AS TO LOCATION ONLY. |
| Filing 13 Minute Entry. Proceedings held before District Judge Stephen R. Bough: TELEPHONE CONFERENCE held on 3/10/2022. Oral Argument on the pending Motion for TRO (Doc. #6) is set for 3/24/2022 at 1:30 PM in Courtroom 7B, Kansas City (SRB) before District Judge Stephen R. Bough. Counsel appearing for Plaintiff(s): Bradley Yeretsky and Bryce Langford. Counsel appearing for Defendant(s): Bryan Wade and Larissa Whittingham. Time in court: 10:00 a.m. to 10:12 a.m. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Richard, Tracey) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of appearance by Larissa M Whittingham on behalf of Christopher Plude (Attorney Larissa M Whittingham added to party Christopher Plude(pty:dft))(Whittingham, Larissa) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of appearance by Bryan O. Wade on behalf of Christopher Plude (Attorney Bryan O. Wade added to party Christopher Plude(pty:dft))(Wade, Bryan) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF HEARING - This is the official notice for this hearing. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. Telephone Conference set for 3/10/2022 at 10:00 AM to set a hearing on the pending motion for TRO before District Judge Stephen R. Bough. (Richard, Tracey) |
| Filing 9 RETURN OF SERVICE of complaint executed by Crown Equipment Corporation. Christopher Plude served on 3/7/2022, answer due 3/28/2022. (Yeretsky, Bradley) |
|
Filing 8
ORDERED that Plaintiff effect service upon Defendant as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4. Once Defendant is served, the Court will set a hearing on the motion for temporary restraining order. Signed on 3/7/2022 by District Judge Stephen R. Bough. (Richard, Tracey)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE (SEALED) by Crown Equipment Corporation re #6 MOTION for temporary restraining order and suggestions in support (Yeretsky, Bradley) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for temporary restraining order and suggestions in support filed by Bradley James Yeretsky on behalf of Crown Equipment Corporation. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 3/21/2022 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Yeretsky, Bradley) |
|
Filing 5
Before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Document Under Seal. (Doc. #3.) For good cause stated, the motion is GRANTED. Plaintiff may file the Declaration of James Vogel to Plaintiff's forthcoming Motion and Suggestions in Support of Motion for Temporary Restraining Order to be filed under seal. Signed on 3/7/2022 by District Judge Stephen R. Bough. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Richard, Tracey)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF INCLUSION FOR MEDIATION AND ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (MAP). REVIEW NOTICE AND MAP GENERAL ORDER CAREFULLY FOR IMPORTANT CHANGES, DEADLINES AND REQUIREMENTS.Notice of MAP assignment to an outside mediator. (Attachments: #1 MAP General Order)(Furtak, Rebecca) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to seal document filed by Bradley James Yeretsky on behalf of Crown Equipment Corporation d/b/a Crown Lift Trucks. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 3/18/2022 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Yeretsky, Bradley) |
| Filing 2 DISCLOSURE OF CORPORATE INTERESTS filed by Bradley James Yeretsky on behalf of Plaintiff Crown Equipment Corporation d/b/a Crown Lift Trucks.(Yeretsky, Bradley) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Christopher Plude filed by Bradley James Yeretsky on behalf of Crown Equipment Corporation d/b/a Crown Lift Trucks. Filing fee $402, receipt number AMOWDC-7832307. Service due by 6/2/2022 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Yeretsky, Bradley) |
| SUMMONS ISSUED as to Christopher Plude. Summons emailed to Plaintiff's counsel for service. (Furtak, Rebecca) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Crown Equipment Corporation v. Plude | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Crown Equipment Corporation doing business as Crown Lift Trucks | |
| Represented By: | Bryce Langford |
| Represented By: | Bradley James Yeretsky |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Christopher Plude | |
| Represented By: | Bryan O. Wade |
| Represented By: | Larissa M Whittingham |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
