Stark v. Morriss
Petitioner: Brandon W Stark
Respondent: Kelly Morriss
Case Number: 6:2022cv03099
Filed: April 21, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: Prisoner Pro Se
Referring Judge: Brian C Wimes
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER that Petitioner file a reply in support of his motion on or before July 18, 2022. Petitioner's failure to file a timely reply may result in dismissal of this case without further notice. Signed on 6/16/22 by District Judge Brian C. Wimes. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Sholes, Amber)
June 16, 2022 Filing 7 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Kelly Morriss. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A - Plea Hearing Transcript, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B - Judgment, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C - 120 Day Order, #4 Exhibit Exhibit D - Docket Entries, #5 Exhibit Exhibit E - Plea Bargain Stipulation, #6 Exhibit Exhibit F - Docket Entries, #7 Exhibit Exhibit G - Sentencing Transcript, #8 Exhibit Exhibit H - FFCL, #9 Exhibit Exhibit I - P&P Report, #10 Exhibit Exhibit J - Pro Se Motion, #11 Exhibit Exhibit K PCR Motion to Dismiss, #12 Exhibit Exhibit L - Docket Entries, #13 Exhibit Exhibit M - 120 Day Hearing Order, #14 Exhibit Exhibit N - Docket Entries, #15 Exhibit Exhibit O - Legal File)(Suddy, Jeffrey)
May 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER that Respondent's motion for extension of time (Doc. #5 ) is granted. Respondent shall file a response on or before June 17, 2022.Signed on 5/24/2022 by District Judge Brian C. Wimes. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Willis, Kathy)
May 23, 2022 Filing 5 First MOTION for extension of time to file response/reply filed by Jeffrey Suddy, Jr on behalf of Kelly Morriss. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 6/6/2022 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Suddy, Jeffrey)
May 2, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE of appearance by Jeffrey Suddy, Jr on behalf of Kelly Morriss (Attorney Jeffrey Suddy, Jr added to party Kelly Morriss(pty:res))(Suddy, Jeffrey)
April 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER: ORDERED that: (1) Petitioner is granted provisional leave to proceed in forma pauperis; and (2) Respondent answer Petitioner's allegations and show cause on or before May 23, 2022, why the relief Petitioner seeks should not be granted. Signed on April 21, 2022 by District Judge Brian C. Wimes. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Davies, Cindy)
April 21, 2022 Filing 2 Inmate ACCOUNT STATEMENT filed by Brandon W Stark. (Davies, Cindy)
April 21, 2022 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Brandon W Stark.(Davies, Cindy)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stark v. Morriss
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Brandon W Stark
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Kelly Morriss
Represented By: Jeffrey Suddy, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?