Johnson v. Dr. Moose et al
Plaintiff: Wayne Johnson
Defendant: Dr. Moose and Jeffrey Krueger
Case Number: 6:2022cv03162
Filed: June 17, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: Roseann Ketchmark
Referring Judge: Prisoner Pro Se
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 27, 2022 Filing 7 CLERK'S JUDGMENT: This case is dismissed without prejudice, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to prosecute and for failure to comply with this Court's Orders. (Willis, Kathy)
July 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER that this case is dismissed, without prejudice, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to prosecute and for failure to comply with this Courts Orders. Any motion to reopen must be filed within a reasonable time and must be accompanied by Plaintiffs initial partial filing fee ($1.66), as previously ordered. Signed on 7/27/2022 by District Judge Roseann Ketchmark. (Willis, Kathy)
July 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER that, because Plaintiff has not submitted to the Court his initial partial filing fee as directed in the Court's June 22, 2022, Order (Doc. 4), Plaintiff shall SHOW CAUSE, on or before July 25, 2022, as to why this case should not be dismissed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) due to Plaintiff's failure to comply with the Court's Orders. Plaintiff's failure to file a timely response will result in dismissal of this case without further notice. Signed on 7/11/2022 by District Judge Roseann Ketchmark. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Willis, Kathy)
June 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER that: (1) Plaintiff is granted provisional leave to proceed in forma pauperis; (2) Plaintiff shall pay to the clerk of the court for the Western District of Missouri, Western Division, an initial partial filing fee of $1.66; and (3) Plaintiff's failure to pay the required initial partial filing fee on or before July 6, 2022, will result in the dismissal of this case without further notice. Signed on 6/22/2022 by District Judge Roseann Ketchmark. (Willis, Kathy)
June 17, 2022 Filing 3 INMATE ACCOUNT STATEMENT filed by Wayne Johnson. (Willis, Kathy)
June 17, 2022 Filing 2 IFP FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT filed by Wayne Johnson. (Willis, Kathy)
June 17, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Wayne Johnson. (Willis, Kathy)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Johnson v. Dr. Moose et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Wayne Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dr. Moose
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jeffrey Krueger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?