Williams v. Precythe et al
Jared Williams, Anthony Zarro, Antonio West, Graves King, II, Eddie Holmes, Stephen Dunn, Vonerrick Williams, Dennis Fann and Lorenzo Washington |
Anne L. Precythe, Anna Boyles, Joan Reinkemeyer, Michele Buckner and Melissa A Satterfield |
6:2022cv03164 |
June 27, 2022 |
US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
Stephen R Bough |
Prisoner Pro Se |
Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
RECEIPT number T22235 in the amount of $10.00 issued to DOC on behalf of WILLIAMS, JARED. (ADIClerk) |
Filing 7 CLERK'S JUDGMENT: This case is dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A(b) for Plaintiff's failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Plaintiffis cautioned that, if he files an appeal, he will be obligated to pay appellate filing fees of $505.00 in addition to the $350.00 filing fee incurred for this case. (Willis, Kathy) |
Filing 6 ORDER that: (1) the agency having custody of Plaintiff forward to the Clerk of the Court monthly payments of 20 percent of the preceding month's income credited to Plaintiff's account each time the amount in the account exceeds $10.00 until the $350.00 filing fee is paid; (2) this case is dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A(b)(1) for Plaintiff's failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; and (3) Plaintiff is cautioned that, if he files an appeal, he will be obligated to pay appellate filing fees of $505.00 (fees that would be in addition to the $350.00 filing fee he incurred by filing this case). See Henderson v. Norris, 129 F.3d 481, 483 (8th Cir. 1997) (citation and quotation marks omitted). Signed on 7/13/2022 by District Judge Stephen R. Bough. (CLERK'S NOTE: Collect filing fee letter mailed to MO DOC Finance Office with copy of 7/13/2022 Order as directed.) (Willis, Kathy) |
RECEIPT number KCMO096053 in the amount of $99.00 issued to Missouri Department of Corrections on behalf of Jared Williams. (Woods, Gloria) |
Filing 5 ORDER: This is a civil rights case filed pro se, and nine convicted state prisoners are listed as plaintiffs. However, due to the requirements of the Prison Litigation Reform Act, multiple prisoner/plaintiff litigation is not possible. See, e.g., Georgeoff v. Barnes, No. 2:09CV00014 ERW, 2009 WL 1405497, at *1 (E.D. Mo. May 18, 2009). Therefore, all plaintiffs, except for lead plaintiff Jared Williams, are dismissed as parties in this case, and their claims are dismissed without prejudice to their reassertion in separate cases. Signed on 7/7/2022 by District Judge Stephen R. Bough. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Willis, Kathy) |
Filing 4 ORDER that: (1) Plaintiff is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis; (2) Plaintiff shall pay to the clerk of the court for the Western District of Missouri, an initial partial filing fee of $27.03; and (3) Plaintiff's failure to pay the required initial partial filing fee on or before July 21, 2022, will result in the dismissal of this case without further notice. Signed on 7/7/2022 by District Judge Stephen R. Bough. (Willis, Kathy) |
Filing 3 INMATE ACCOUNT STATEMENT filed by Jared Williams. (Willis, Kathy) |
Filing 2 IFP FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT filed by Jared Williams for all Plaintiffs. (Willis, Kathy) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Jared Williams for all Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 1983 Complaint exhibits, #2 Declarations)(Willis, Kathy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.