Love v. USA
| Earl F. Love |
| USA |
| 6:2022cv03177 |
| July 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Roseann Ketchmark |
| Prisoner: Vacate Sentence |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by USA re 7 Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply, filed by Patrick Carney on behalf of Respondent USA. Related document: 7 Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply,.(Carney, Patrick) |
Filing 7
ORDER that, Respondent's motion for an extension of time to file a response (Doc. #6 ), is GRANTED. Respondent shall answer Movant's allegations and show cause on or before September 13, 2022, why the relief Movant seeks should not be granted.Signed on 8/29/2022 by District Judge Roseann Ketchmark. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Willis, Kathy)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION for extension of time to file response/reply as to 5 Order, filed by Patrick Carney on behalf of USA. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 9/12/2022 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Related document(s) 5 ) (Carney, Patrick) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER that Respondent answer Movant's allegations and show cause on or before August 30, 2022, why the relief Movant seeks should not be granted. Signed on 8/1/2022 by District Judge Roseann Ketchmark. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Sholes, Amber)
|
| Filing 4 MOVANT'S RESPONSE to order re #3 Order, filed by Earl F. Love. (Related document(s) #3 ) (Cole, Robert) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER that: (1) Movant is directed to correct the above-listed technical defects in this motion on or before JULY 29, 2022. Movant is also directed to ensure that the handwriting or text is legible and dark enough to be read and scanned; (2) the Clerk of the Court is directed to mail Movant a copy of this Order along with the signature page; and (3) FAILURE OF MOVANT TO COMPLY WITH THIS COURT'S ORDER WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THIS ACTION WITHOUT FURTHER WARNING TO MOVANT. Signed on 7/15/2022 by District Judge Roseann Ketchmark. (Willis, Kathy)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE of appearance by Patrick Carney on behalf of USA (Attorney Patrick Carney added to party USA(pty:res))(Carney, Patrick) |
| Filing 1 MOTION to vacate, set aside or correct sentence (2255) filed by Earl F. Love. (#1 2255 attachments)(Willis, Kathy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Love v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Earl F. Love | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: USA | |
| Represented By: | Patrick Carney |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
