United States of America v. Hightower
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Travis C. Hightower
Case Number: 6:2022cv03248
Filed: September 23, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: M Douglas Harpool
Referring Judge: David P Rush
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 3, 2022 Filing 7 MAIL RETURNED as undeliverable. Mail sent to Travis C. Hightower. (Related document(s)[Notice 10-20-22]). Per BOP Inmate Locator, Defendant Hightower, #17763-035, was released on 10/19/22. (Keller, Jeanne)
October 20, 2022 NOTICE OF HEARING CANCELLATION - The Evidentiary Hearing scheduled for 10/25/2022 at 9:00 AM has been cancelled. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (DO) Modified on 10/21/2022 NEF mailed to defendant at the address listed on the docket (Siegert, Karen).
October 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (SEALED) for #5 Report and Recommendations (Sealed), Motions terminated: #5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Sealed) re #1 Petition for Mental Status (Sealed), filed by United States of America. The government's Petition (Doc. 1) is GRANTED. Defendant is conditionally released under conditions contained in this order. Signed on 10/4/22 by District Judge M. Douglas Harpool. (View, Pat)
October 4, 2022 Filing 5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Sealed) re #1 Petition for Mental Status (Sealed), filed by United States of America Objections to R&R waived by the parties. Signed on 10/4/22 by Magistrate Judge David P. Rush. (IN)
October 3, 2022 Filing 4 STATUS REPORT (SEALED) by Travis C. Hightower. (Mercer, David)
September 27, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE OF HEARING - This is the official notice for this hearing. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. Evidentiary Hearing on Motion for Conditional Release set for 10/25/2022 at 9:00 AM via Video Teleconference - Springfield before Magistrate Judge David P. Rush. (DO)
September 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge David P. Rush and appointing the Federal Public Defender's Office to represent the defendant in this case. Signed on 9/27/22 by District Judge M. Douglas Harpool. (Siegert, Karen)
September 23, 2022 Filing 1 PETITION FOR MENTAL STATUS (SEALED) Petition for Administrative Transfer and Motion for Conditional Release filed by Shane Patrick McCullough on behalf of United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E)(McCullough, Shane)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America v. Hightower
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America
Represented By: Cynthia J. Hyde
Represented By: Kacey Tilley
Represented By: Shane Patrick McCullough
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Travis C. Hightower
Represented By: David R. Mercer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?