Collier v. Rice
| Riley Collier |
| A. Rice |
| 6:2022cv03273 |
| October 18, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Roseann Ketchmark |
| Prisoner Pro Se |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 CLERK'S JUDGMENT: This case is dismissed, without prejudice, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to prosecute and for failure to comply with the Court's Orders. Any motion to reopen must be filed within a reasonable time and must be accompanied by Plaintiff's initial partial filing fee, as previously ordered. (Willis, Kathy) |
Filing 6
ORDER that this case is dismissed, without prejudice, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to prosecute and for failure to comply with the Court's Orders. Any motion to reopen must be filed within a reasonable time and must be accompanied by Plaintiff's initial partial filing fee, as previously ordered. Signed on 11/30/2022 by District Judge Roseann Ketchmark. (Willis, Kathy)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER that, because Plaintiff has not submitted his initial partial filing fee as directed in the Court's October 26, 2022, Order (Doc. 4), Plaintiff shall SHOW CAUSE, on or before November 28, 2022, as to why this case should not be dismissed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) due to Plaintiff's failure to comply with the Court's Orders. Plaintiff's failure to file a timely response will result in dismissal of this case without further notice. Signed on 11/14/2022 by District Judge Roseann Ketchmark. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Willis, Kathy)
|
| NOTICE of change of address provided by FRDC Mail Room, "Mr. Collier, #1345940, is currently at Potosi Correctional Center, transferred on 11/04/2022." (Willis, Kathy) |
|
Filing 4
ORDERED that: (1) Plaintiff is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis; (2) Plaintiff shall pay to the clerk of the court for the Western District of Missouri, an initial partial filing fee of $39.94; and (3) Plaintiff's failure to pay the required initial partial filing fee on or before November 9, 2022, will result in the dismissal of this case without further notice. Signed on 10/26/2022 by District Judge Roseann Ketchmark. (Willis, Kathy)
|
| Filing 3 INMATE ACCOUNT STATEMENT filed by Riley Collier. (Willis, Kathy) |
| Filing 2 IFP FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT filed by Riley Collier. (Willis, Kathy) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Riley Collier. (Willis, Kathy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Collier v. Rice | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Riley Collier | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: A. Rice | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
