Thompson v. Buckner et al
Plaintiff: James R Thompson
Defendant: Michele Buckner, Katherine Barton, Dr. Ashok Chada and Dr. E. Jackson
Case Number: 6:2023cv03002
Filed: January 4, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: Roseann Ketchmark
Referring Judge: Prisoner Pro Se
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 22, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel (Doc. #11 ) is DENIED without prejudice. Signed on 2/22/2023 by District Judge Roseann Ketchmark. (Willis, Kathy)
February 22, 2023 Filing 11 PLAINTIFF'S MOTION for appointment of counsel filed by James R Thompson. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 3/8/2023. (Willis, Kathy)
February 21, 2023 RECEIPT number KCMO098978 in the amount of $8.10 issued to James Thompson. (Crocker, Susan)
February 13, 2023 Filing 10 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned unexecuted as to Katherine Barton; Dr. Ashok Chada; Dr. E. Jackson, filed by Katherine Barton, Dr. Ashok Chada, Dr. E. Jackson. (Eckenrode, J.)
February 10, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDERED that: (1) the agency having custody of Plaintiff forward to the Clerk of the Court monthly payments of 20 percent of the preceding month's income credited to Plaintiff's account each time the amount in the account exceeds $10 until the $350 filing fee is paid ($350); (2) the Clerk of the Court shall provide the parties with mediation request forms; (3) the Attorney General of Missouri, Corizon, and Centurion shall notify the Court, in writing, within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order, for which Defendants they will and will not waive service of process; and (4) Defendants shall answer or otherwise respond, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and 12, within sixty days from the date of this Order if service of process is waived, or within twenty-one days after service of process if service of process is not waived. Signed on 2/10/2023 by District Judge Roseann Ketchmark. (Willis, Kathy)
February 1, 2023 Filing 8 PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE to Order to Show Cause (Doc. 7 ) filed by James R Thompson.(Willis, Kathy)
January 27, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER that, because Plaintiff has not submitted his initial partial filing fee as directed by the Court's January 9, 2023, Order (Doc. #6 ), Plaintiff shall SHOW CAUSE, on or before February 10, 2023, as to why this case should not be dismissed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) due to Plaintiff's failure to comply with the Court's Order. Plaintiff's failure to file a timely response will result in dismissal of this case without further notice. Signed on 1/27/2023 by District Judge Roseann Ketchmark. (Willis, Kathy)
January 9, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER that: (1) Plaintiff is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis; (2) Plaintiff shall pay to the clerk of the court for the Western District of Missouri, an initial partial filing fee of $8.10; and (3) Plaintiff's failure to pay the required initial partial filing fee on or before January 23, 2023, will result in the dismissal of this case without further notice. Signed on 1/9/2023 by District Judge Roseann Ketchmark. (Willis, Kathy)
January 6, 2023 Filing 5 INMATE ACCOUNT STATEMENT filed by James R Thompson. (Willis, Kathy)
January 6, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel (Doc. #3 ) is denied without prejudice. Signed on 1/6/2023 by District Judge Roseann Ketchmark. (Willis, Kathy)
January 4, 2023 Filing 3 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel filed by James R Thompson. (Willis, Kathy)
January 4, 2023 Filing 2 IFP FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT filed by James R Thompson. (Willis, Kathy)
January 4, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by James R Thompson. (Attachment: #1 1983 Complaint Exhibits)(Willis, Kathy)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Thompson v. Buckner et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James R Thompson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michele Buckner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Katherine Barton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dr. Ashok Chada
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dr. E. Jackson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?