Casada v. Peck et al
| James Ray Casada |
| Harry Peck, City of Merriam Woods and Harry Peek |
| 6:2023cv03013 |
| January 10, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| M Douglas Harpool |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDER re #14 This Court considers Pro Se Plaintiffs Motion (Doc. 14) to be a Notice of Voluntary Dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i). This court accepts Plaintiffs Notice of Voluntary Dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i). This case is hereby dismissed without prejudice. Each party to bear its own attorneys fees and costs. Clerk's office ordered to mail a copy of this order to Pro Se Plaintiff's address of record. Signed February 1, 2023 District Judge M. Douglas Harpool. (Clark, Christopher) Modified on 2/2/2023 order mailed to Pro Se Plaintiff James Ray Casada, 4005 Westgate, Merriam Woods, MO 65740(Siegert, Karen).
|
| Filing 14 Pro Se MOTION to dismiss case filed by James Ray Casada. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 2/13/2023 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Received via EDSS on January 29, 2023.)(Furtak, Rebecca) |
| Filing 13 SUGGESTIONS in support re #12 MOTION to stay filed by Joseph W. Allen on behalf of Defendant City of Merriam Woods. (Related document(s) #12 ) (Allen, Joseph) |
| Filing 12 MOTION to stay filed by Joseph W. Allen on behalf of City of Merriam Woods. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 2/10/2023 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Allen, Joseph) |
| NOTICE OF DOCKET MODIFICATION. A modification has been made to the document filed on 1/26/2023 as Document No. 9, Motion for Stay. The document has been deleted as the Suggestions in Support were filed as part of the Motion. Counsel will refile the document using the correct event for the Motion and the separate event for Suggestions in Support. This is a text entry only - no document is attached. (Furtak, Rebecca) |
| Filing 11 RETURN OF SERVICE (non cmp) (Attachments: #1 Notice of Exhibit Attachment Exhibit A Certified Mail Return)(Allen, Joseph) |
| Filing 10 SUGGESTIONS in opposition re #8 MOTION to appoint counsel filed by Joseph W. Allen on behalf of Defendant City of Merriam Woods. Reply suggestions due by 2/9/2023 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Related document(s) #8 ) (Allen, Joseph) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to stay , MOTION for hearing filed by Joseph W. Allen on behalf of City of Merriam Woods. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 2/9/2023 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Allen, Joseph) |
| Filing 8 PRO SE MOTION to appoint counsel filed by James Ray Casada. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 2/8/2023 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Siegert, Karen) |
| NOTICE of filing: Mediation and Assessment Program Reminder: Your Designation of Mediator is due soon (filed as an ADR event in CM/ECF). See Notice of Inclusion and MAP General Order for specifics. (ADI, MAP) Modified on 1/25/2023 to reflect Notice was mailed to James Ray Casada, 4005 Westgate, Merriam Woods, MO 65740. (Matthes Mitra, Renea). |
|
Filing 7
RULE 16 NOTICE. Proposed scheduling order due by 3/9/2023. Rule 26 conference due by 2/22/2023. Copy of Rule 16 Notice mailed to Plaintiff, pro se, James Ray Casada, 4005 Westgate, Merriam Woods, MO 65740. Signed on 1/23/23 by District Judge M. Douglas Harpool. (View, Pat)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Joseph W. Allen on behalf of City of Merriam Woods. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 2/3/2023 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Allen, Joseph) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of appearance by Joseph W. Allen on behalf of City of Merriam Woods (Attorney Joseph W. Allen added to party City of Merriam Woods(pty:dft))(Allen, Joseph) |
| Filing 4 COMPLAINT against City of Merriam Woods, Harry Peck James Ray Casada. Service due by 4/17/2023 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Furtak, Rebecca) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER granting #1 motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis.The Clerk of Court is directed to electronically file the Complaint as of the date of this order. The Clerk of Court shall also forward the appropriate process forms to plaintiff. Within twenty (20) days, plaintiff shall return the completed summons and service forms to the Clerk's Office showing the address where defendant(s) may be served. Upon receipt, the Clerk of Court is directed to issue summons and process and deliver same to the United States Marshal for service upon the defendant(s), pursuant to Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Marshal is permitted to attempt service by mail. Signed on January 17, 2023 by District Judge M. Douglas Harpool. (Clark, Christopher) Modified on 1/18/2023 to reflect a copy of the Complaint, Summons, and USM-285 forms were mailed to Plaintiff. (Furtak, Rebecca).
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF INCLUSION FOR MEDIATION AND ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (MAP). REVIEW NOTICE AND MAP GENERAL ORDER CAREFULLY FOR IMPORTANT CHANGES, DEADLINES AND REQUIREMENTS.Notice of MAP assignment to an outside mediator. (Attachments: #1 MAP General Order)(Siegert, Karen) |
| Filing 1 PRO SE MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by James Ray Casada. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 1/24/2023 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Financial Status, #2 Complaint, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Siegert, Karen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
