UNUM Life Insurance Company of America v. Webb
| UNUM Life Insurance Company of America |
| James P. Webb, M.D. |
| 6:2023cv03102 |
| April 4, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| M Douglas Harpool |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 AMENDED COMPLAINT against James P. Webb, MD filed by Robert J. Golterman on behalf of UNUM Life Insurance Company of America. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Golterman, Robert) |
| NOTICE of filing: Mediation and Assessment Program Reminder: Your Designation of Mediator is due soon (filed as an ADR event in CM/ECF). See Notice of Inclusion and MAP General Order for specifics. (ADI, MAP) |
Filing 7
RULE 16 NOTICE. Proposed scheduling order due by 7/14/2023. Rule 26 conference due by 6/29/2023. Signed on 5/30/23 by District Judge M. Douglas Harpool. (View, Pat)
|
| Filing 6 SUGGESTIONS in support re #5 MOTION to strike or in the Alternative to Dismiss Plaintiff's Request for Attorneys' Fees filed by Austin Jay Preston on behalf of Defendant James P. Webb, MD. (Related document(s) #5 ) (Preston, Austin) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to strike or in the Alternative to Dismiss Plaintiff's Request for Attorneys' Fees filed by Austin Jay Preston on behalf of James P. Webb, MD. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 6/9/2023 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Preston, Austin) |
| Filing 4 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, on behalf of James P. Webb, MD.(Attorney Austin Jay Preston added to party James P. Webb, MD(pty:dft))(Preston, Austin) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF INCLUSION FOR MEDIATION AND ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (MAP). REVIEW NOTICE AND MAP GENERAL ORDER CAREFULLY FOR IMPORTANT CHANGES, DEADLINES AND REQUIREMENTS.Notice of MAP assignment to an outside mediator. (Attachments: #1 MAP General Order) (Hanna, Jaime) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of appearance by Robert J. Golterman on behalf of UNUM Life Insurance Company of America (Golterman, Robert) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against James P. Webb, MD filed by Robert J. Golterman on behalf of UNUM Life Insurance Company of America. Filing fee $402, receipt number AMOWDC-8397892. Service due by 7/3/2023 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Golterman, Robert) |
| SUMMONS ISSUED as to James P. Webb, MD. (Hanna, Jaime) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: UNUM Life Insurance Company of America v. Webb | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: UNUM Life Insurance Company of America | |
| Represented By: | Thomas R. Selig |
| Represented By: | Robert J. Golterman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: James P. Webb, M.D. | |
| Represented By: | Austin Jay Preston |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
