Woodruff v. Frank E. Lorenz Sr. Trust et al
| Edgar Eugene Woodruff |
| Frank E. Lorenz Sr. Trust and Barbara Lorenz |
| 6:2023cv03152 |
| May 19, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Roseann Ketchmark |
| Civil Rights: Accomodations |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Fair Housing Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ***Remark: Per #2 Order, this case has been consolidated with Case nos. 23-cv-3150-RK and 23-cv-3151-RK. All filings should be docketed in THIS case. (Hanna, Jaime) |
Filing 2
ORDER that #1 motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in Case Nos. 6:23-cv-03150-RK, 6:23-cv-03151-RK, and 6:23-cv-03152-RK are DENIED and these cases are DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed on 6/6/2023 by District Judge Roseann Ketchmark. (Brown, Jonathan) Modified on 6/6/2023: Mailed to Edgar Eugene Woodruff, 1445 E. Commercial St, Apt B, Springfield, MO 65803. (Hanna, Jaime)
|
| Filing 1 Pro Se MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Edgar Eugene Woodruff. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 6/2/2023 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Complaint, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Attachment A, #5 Attachment B, #6 Attachment C, #7 Attachment D, #8 Attachment E). NEF mailed to Plaintiff. (Furtak, Rebecca) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
