Gebhard v. Kijakazi
Plaintiff: Carrie Ann Gebhard
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi
Case Number: 6:2023cv03348
Filed: November 15, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: Beth Phillips
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 12, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER granting #6 Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File the Answer and/or Electronic Certified Administrative Record to Plaintiff's Complaint is GRANTED, up to and including March 18, 2024. Signed on 1/12/24 by Chief District Judge Beth Phillips. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Cordell, Annette)
January 12, 2024 Filing 6 MOTION to extend Social Security deadlines for filing of Defendants Answer and/or Submission of Administrative Record, on or before March 18, 2024 filed by Elizabeth D Hatting on behalf of Kilolo Kijakazi. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 1/26/2024 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Hatting, Elizabeth)
November 20, 2023 Filing 5 NOTICE of appearance by Elizabeth D Hatting on behalf of Kilolo Kijakazi (Attorney Elizabeth D Hatting added to party Kilolo Kijakazi(pty:dft))(Hatting, Elizabeth)
November 17, 2023 Filing 4 NOTICE OF SERVICE of Social Security Case. Pursuant to Rule 3 of the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions under 42 U.S.C. 405(g), the Clerk has generated a Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) using the Case Management and Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) system, notifying the Social Security Administration's Office of General Counsel and the U.S. Attorney's Office of the case filing. No summons shall issue. (Hanna, Jaime)
November 16, 2023 Filing 3 SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT filed by Kelsey Young on behalf of Carrie Ann Gebhard. (Filing fee $402 receipt number IFP) filed byKelsey Young on behalf of Carrie Ann Gebhard. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Young, Kelsey)
November 16, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER granting #1 Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall have twenty days to electronically file the Complaint. Signed on 11/16/23 by Chief District Judge Beth Phillips. (Cordell, Annette)
November 15, 2023 Filing 1 MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Kelsey Young on behalf of Carrie Ann Gebhard. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 11/29/2023 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Complaint)(Attorney Kelsey Young added to party Carrie Ann Gebhard(pty:pla))(Young, Kelsey)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gebhard v. Kijakazi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carrie Ann Gebhard
Represented By: Kelsey Young
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi
Represented By: Ssaogcomms Ssaogcomms
Represented By: Elizabeth D Hatting
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?